From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jan Kiszka Subject: Re: qemu-kvm.git build problem Date: Fri, 15 Jan 2010 09:58:40 +0100 Message-ID: <4B502E40.20409@web.de> References: <1262025646.2774.16.camel@localhost.localdomain> <1263014581.2439.207.camel@localhost.localdomain> <4B4AF9D2.3080100@siemens.com> <4B4AFAD9.3010604@redhat.com> <4B4AFBC7.1020801@siemens.com> <4B4BC0F3.2010507@web.de> <20100112005118.GO6632@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <4B4C329F.4010301@web.de> <20100112135018.GE6807@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <4B4E6135.8030206@web.de> <20100114021342.GN6803@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="------------enigEC643711497600E49DB5CC21" Cc: Avi Kivity , Lucas Meneghel Rodrigues , KVM mailing list , Michael Goldish , Eduardo Habkost , Dor Laor To: paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com Return-path: Received: from fmmailgate03.web.de ([217.72.192.234]:47851 "EHLO fmmailgate03.web.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751407Ab0AOI6k (ORCPT ); Fri, 15 Jan 2010 03:58:40 -0500 In-Reply-To: <20100114021342.GN6803@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Sender: kvm-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156) --------------enigEC643711497600E49DB5CC21 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Paul E. McKenney wrote: > On Thu, Jan 14, 2010 at 01:11:33AM +0100, Jan Kiszka wrote: >> Paul E. McKenney wrote: >>> On Tue, Jan 12, 2010 at 09:28:15AM +0100, Jan Kiszka wrote: >>>> If so, I will try to write something like this the next days. Will >>>> surely appreciate your review afterwards! >>> Sounds good! >>> >> Here we go, find the commit inlined below. You may be primarily >> interested in kvm_synchronize_sched_expedited() and the helper thread >> function kvm_rcu_sync_thread. As I use a dedicated thread I simplified= >> some parts compared to upstream. Light testing indicates that it works= =2E >=20 > Cool!!! >=20 > Have you had a chance to run rcutorture on this implementation? >=20 No, this would mean backporting rcutorture - is it straightforward (limited time...)? Jan --------------enigEC643711497600E49DB5CC21 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.9 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with SUSE - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iEYEARECAAYFAktQLkEACgkQitSsb3rl5xTGyACfVEf129tGYgpp9j8y8D3CjhT3 2y8An3cjl06omLeFWcMws4bzMC1Y/Y5g =bPYB -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --------------enigEC643711497600E49DB5CC21--