From: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org>
To: Jesse Barnes <jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
Ivan Kokshaysky <ink@jurassic.park.msu.ru>,
Kenji Kaneshige <kaneshige.kenji@jp.fujitsu.com>,
Alex Chiang <achiang@hp.com>,
Bjorn Helgaas <bjorn.helgaas@hp.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-pci@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 08/14] pci: update bridge res to get more big range in pci assign unssign
Date: Fri, 15 Jan 2010 13:12:39 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4B50DA47.80800@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20100115111254.1f9d66a3@jbarnes-piketon>
On 01/15/2010 11:12 AM, Jesse Barnes wrote:
> On Tue, 22 Dec 2009 15:02:28 -0800
> Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org> wrote:
>
>> BIOS separate IO range between several IOHs, and on some slots, BIOS
>> assign the resource to the bridge, but stop assigning resource to the
>> device under that bridge, because the device need big resource.
>>
>> 1. pci assign unassign and record the failed device resource.
>> 2. clear the BIOS assigned resource of the parent bridge of fail
>> device 3. go back and call pci assign unsigned
>> 4. if it still fail, will go up more bridges. and clear and try again.
>>
>> use pci_try_num to control back track bridge levels.
>>
>> -v2: update it with resource_list_x
>> -v3: make pci_try_num default to 1. and when pci_try_num is set to
>> more than 1 will check it with max_depth, and adjust that to make
>> sure it is bigger enough
>
> I really don't like the 'try' argument. Either we can assign the
> resource or not; 'try=' just makes the whole thing scarier, as if we
> expect problems if we release too many resources. If that's the case,
> then the whole approach must be flawed, since it means we're not taking
> into account some resources, or we're missing something about the
> system configuration.
before this patchset, acctually try = 1, and will not touch pci bridge resource if that are assigned by BIOS.
with this patchset, try = 1, will just like the old ways.
try = 2, it will find the deepest bridge, and increase the try.
YH
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-01-15 21:13 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 42+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-12-22 23:02 [PATCH 00/14] pci: update pci bridge resources Yinghai Lu
2009-12-22 23:02 ` [PATCH 01/14] pci: separate pci_setup_bridge to small functions Yinghai Lu
2010-01-15 18:54 ` Jesse Barnes
2009-12-22 23:02 ` [PATCH 02/14] resource: add release_child_resources Yinghai Lu
2010-01-15 18:54 ` Jesse Barnes
2009-12-22 23:02 ` [PATCH 03/14] pci: add pci_bridge_release_unused_res and pci_bus_release_unused_bridge_res Yinghai Lu
2010-01-15 18:53 ` Jesse Barnes
2010-01-16 0:20 ` Yinghai Lu
2009-12-22 23:02 ` [PATCH 04/14] pci: don't dump it when bus resource flags is not used Yinghai Lu
2010-01-15 18:54 ` Jesse Barnes
2009-12-22 23:02 ` [PATCH 05/14] pci: add failed_list to record failed one for pci_bus_assign_resources Yinghai Lu
2010-01-15 18:56 ` Jesse Barnes
2010-01-15 21:13 ` Yinghai Lu
2010-01-15 21:41 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2009-12-22 23:02 ` [PATCH 06/14] pci: reject mmio range start from 0 on pci_bridge read Yinghai Lu
2010-01-15 19:19 ` Jesse Barnes
2010-01-15 21:15 ` Yinghai Lu
2009-12-22 23:02 ` [PATCH 07/14] pci: don't shrink bridge resources Yinghai Lu
2010-01-15 19:04 ` Jesse Barnes
2010-01-15 21:09 ` Yinghai Lu
2010-01-15 21:31 ` Jesse Barnes
2010-01-16 0:32 ` Yinghai Lu
2009-12-22 23:02 ` [PATCH 08/14] pci: update bridge res to get more big range in pci assign unssign Yinghai Lu
2010-01-15 19:12 ` Jesse Barnes
2010-01-15 21:12 ` Yinghai Lu [this message]
2010-01-15 21:34 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2010-01-15 21:34 ` Jesse Barnes
2009-12-22 23:02 ` [PATCH 09/14] pci: introduce pci_assign_unassigned_bridge_resources Yinghai Lu
2010-01-13 0:50 ` Kenji Kaneshige
2010-01-13 1:58 ` Yinghai Lu
2010-01-13 7:31 ` Kenji Kaneshige
2010-01-13 7:52 ` Yinghai Lu
2009-12-22 23:02 ` [PATCH 10/14] pci: pciehp clean flow in pciehp_configure_device Yinghai Lu
2010-01-15 19:14 ` Jesse Barnes
2010-01-15 21:14 ` Yinghai Lu
2009-12-22 23:02 ` [PATCH 11/14] pci: pciehp second try to get big range for pcie devices Yinghai Lu
2009-12-22 23:02 ` [PATCH 12/14] pci: pci_bridge_release_res Yinghai Lu
2009-12-22 23:02 ` [PATCH 13/14] pciehp: add support for bridge resource reallocation Yinghai Lu
2009-12-22 23:02 ` [PATCH 14/14] pci: set PCI_PREF_RANGE_TYPE_64 in pci_bridge_check_ranges Yinghai Lu
2010-01-08 21:33 ` [PATCH 00/14] pci: update pci bridge resources Patrick Keller
2010-01-11 21:57 ` Patrick Keller
2010-01-12 18:18 ` Jesse Barnes
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4B50DA47.80800@kernel.org \
--to=yinghai@kernel.org \
--cc=achiang@hp.com \
--cc=bjorn.helgaas@hp.com \
--cc=ink@jurassic.park.msu.ru \
--cc=jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org \
--cc=kaneshige.kenji@jp.fujitsu.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.