diff for duplicates of <4B536502.20102@gmail.com>

diff --git a/a/1.txt b/N1/1.txt
index fb869dc..66bfbef 100644
--- a/a/1.txt
+++ b/N1/1.txt
@@ -18,9 +18,3 @@ CPU and would always be present.
 > I start believing that we'd rather identify these Atom models using
 > CPUID rather than a PCI device.
 >
-
-
-_______________________________________________
-lm-sensors mailing list
-lm-sensors@lm-sensors.org
-http://lists.lm-sensors.org/mailman/listinfo/lm-sensors
diff --git a/a/content_digest b/N1/content_digest
index ef7532d..12f775e 100644
--- a/a/content_digest
+++ b/N1/content_digest
@@ -5,8 +5,8 @@
  "ref\0SNT125-W147C55AB6EB65D41CAAFFFC3680@phx.gbl\0"
  "ref\020100117161518.4912be7c@hyperion.delvare\0"
  "From\0Robert Hancock <hancockrwd@gmail.com>\0"
- "Subject\0Re: [lm-sensors] [PATCH] hwmon: (coretemp) Fix TjMax for Atom\0"
- "Date\0Sun, 17 Jan 2010 19:29:06 +0000\0"
+ "Subject\0Re: [lm-sensors] [PATCH] hwmon: (coretemp) Fix TjMax for Atom    N450/D410/D510 CPUs\0"
+ "Date\0Sun, 17 Jan 2010 13:29:06 -0600\0"
  "To\0Jean Delvare <khali@linux-fr.org>\0"
  "Cc\0Yuhong Bao <yuhongbao_386@hotmail.com>"
   yong.y.wang@linux.intel.com
@@ -34,12 +34,6 @@
  ">\n"
  "> I start believing that we'd rather identify these Atom models using\n"
  "> CPUID rather than a PCI device.\n"
- ">\n"
- "\n"
- "\n"
- "_______________________________________________\n"
- "lm-sensors mailing list\n"
- "lm-sensors@lm-sensors.org\n"
- http://lists.lm-sensors.org/mailman/listinfo/lm-sensors
+ >
 
-012e644e7f45a46f3866d700f6686645688c46ae1cb26b24c531c18dfe45a7e0
+d8005c23ba3597c0910fd3fd63bdfdf31532405fb3c92ef81dd53d1af8ffab84
