From: Avi Kivity <avi@redhat.com>
To: Sheng Yang <sheng@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@redhat.com>, kvm@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] KVM: Add missing emulation failure report in kvm_mmu_page_fault()
Date: Mon, 18 Jan 2010 13:32:14 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4B5446BE.9070009@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <201001181732.25678.sheng@linux.intel.com>
On 01/18/2010 11:32 AM, Sheng Yang wrote:
> On Sunday 17 January 2010 20:34:23 Avi Kivity wrote:
>
>> On 01/15/2010 10:44 AM, Sheng Yang wrote:
>>
>>> Currently we only have handle_invalid_guest_state() reported emulation
>>> failure...
>>>
>> This is intentional - instead of spamming dmesg, we exit with an
>> internal error. Modern qemu-kvm will halt and allow the user to inspect
>> the guest with the built-in disassembler.
>>
>>
> I think keep it there still useful for some users. And we have the same report
> in handle_invalid_guest_state(), and we even have "emulation failure, check
> dmesg for details" in QEmu when handling KVM_INTERNAL_ERROR_EMULATION.
>
> I think add one line here is the easiest way to keep consistence, and is
> handy.
>
Another way to keep consistency is to remove emulation failure reporting
in handle_invalid_guest_state() :)
There are two problems with the kernel failure report. First, it
doesn't report enough data - registers, surrounding instructions, etc.
that are needed to explain what is going on. Second, it can flood
dmesg, which is a pretty bad thing to do.
I have a patch somewhere that adds instruction emulation bytes (both
successful and failed) to ftrace. That may be useful, perhaps.
--
error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-01-18 11:32 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-01-15 8:44 [PATCH] KVM: Add missing emulation failure report in kvm_mmu_page_fault() Sheng Yang
2010-01-17 12:34 ` Avi Kivity
2010-01-18 9:32 ` Sheng Yang
2010-01-18 11:32 ` Avi Kivity [this message]
2010-01-19 3:06 ` Sheng Yang
2010-01-19 7:54 ` Avi Kivity
2010-01-19 7:57 ` Gleb Natapov
2010-01-19 8:05 ` Sheng Yang
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4B5446BE.9070009@redhat.com \
--to=avi@redhat.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mtosatti@redhat.com \
--cc=sheng@linux.intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.