From: dirk.behme@googlemail.com (Dirk Behme)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Kernel Start-up Time
Date: Mon, 18 Jan 2010 20:39:45 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4B54B901.2000905@googlemail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1263829143.3207.34.camel@linux-1lbu>
On 18.01.2010 16:39, Steve Chen wrote:
> On Mon, 2010-01-18 at 10:54 +0200, Caglar Akyuz wrote:
>> On Monday 18 January 2010 10:39:27 am Tonyliu wrote:
>>> Caglar Akyuz wrote:
>>>> Hello,
>>>>
>>>> While measuring Linux start-up time, I see that printing version string
>>>> in "start_kernel" takes ~1.3 seconds. I guess this is the time between
>>>> from "bootloader jumping to uImage" and "printing version string in
>>>> generic start_kernel code". Relevant part of my boot log is attached.
>>>>
>>>> My question: is it normal this 1.3 sec init time? My system is 297 MHZ
>>>> arm926ej-s with a 162MHZ DDR2 memory.
>>>
>>> It depends on where you start to measure it?
>>> Starting from when power is turned on.
>>> Starting from when the first instruction executes.
>>> Start from the bootloader tries to load the kernel image.
>>> ...
>>
>> That number is relative, it is the time passing from u-boot jumping to kernel
>> and kernel starting.
>>
>>> I think this type of mearsurement makes no much sense to you, since
>>> normally
>>> people want to know
>>> When the kernel loads userspace or
>>> When the first app starts to run.
>>>
>>
>> First application starts in ~4 second. This time consists of:
>>
>> 1) ~1 sec for application start.
>> 2) ~1 sec for userspace init, mouting filesys, etc.
>> 3) ~1 sec for kernel init for drivers and machine specific code
>> 4) ~1 sec for the aforementioned delay.
>>
>>> These are more meaningful for specific product.
>>>
>>
>> It is number 4 that I'm trying to understand. I think it has the highest
>> chance to contribute to end goal. But if it is as expected, then no room for
>> optimization there.
>>
>
> Well, "no room for optimization" is a pretty strong statement. Last
> year Monta Vista demo the 1 second boot.
>
> http://mvista.com/press_release_detail.php?fid=news/2009/Ultra-fast-boot.html&d=
>
> I realized that it is a different and faster processor, but I'm pretty
> sure there are plenty of places you can trim the boot time. It is a
> matter of time and effort.
Maybe
http://elinux.org/Boot_Time
could help you a little.
Best regards
Dirk
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-01-18 19:39 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-01-18 8:10 Kernel Start-up Time Caglar Akyuz
2010-01-18 8:39 ` Tonyliu
2010-01-18 8:54 ` Caglar Akyuz
2010-01-18 15:39 ` Steve Chen
2010-01-18 19:39 ` Dirk Behme [this message]
2010-01-19 8:40 ` Caglar Akyuz
2010-01-19 8:36 ` Caglar Akyuz
2010-01-19 9:02 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2010-01-19 14:31 ` Caglar Akyuz
2010-01-19 11:04 ` Bahadir Balban
2010-01-19 14:40 ` Caglar Akyuz
2010-01-19 11:04 ` Johannes Stezenbach
2010-01-19 14:35 ` Caglar Akyuz
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4B54B901.2000905@googlemail.com \
--to=dirk.behme@googlemail.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.