From: Rick Jones <rick.jones2@hp.com>
To: Krishna Kumar2 <krkumar2@in.ibm.com>
Cc: davem@davemloft.net, eric.dumazet@gmail.com,
ilpo.jarvinen@helsinki.fi, netdev@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC] [PATCH] Optimize TCP sendmsg in favour of fast devices?
Date: Tue, 19 Jan 2010 09:41:26 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4B55EEC6.4070402@hp.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <OFA56A461E.61811628-ON652576AD.0022D2A5-652576AD.002350AE@in.ibm.com>
Krishna Kumar2 wrote:
> Rick Jones <rick.jones2@hp.com> wrote on 01/15/2010 11:43:06 PM:
>>Multiple process tests may not be as easy in netperf as it is in
>>iperf, but under:
>>
>>ftp://ftp.netperf.org/netperf/misc
>>
>> I have a single-stream test script I use called runemomni.sh and an
>> example of its output, as well as an aggregate script I use called
>> runemomniagg2.sh - I'll post an example of its output there as
>> soon as I finish some runs.
>
>
> I usually run netperf for smaller number of threads and aggregate
> the output using some scripts. I will try what you suggested above,
> and see if I can get consistent results for higher number of
> processes. Thanks for the links.
You're welcome - the output of the aggregate script is up there too now
- generally I run three systems for the aggregate tests and then include
the TCP_MAERTs stuff, but in this case since I had only two otherwise
identical systems, TCP_MAERTs would have been redundant.
rick jones
prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-01-19 17:41 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-01-15 5:33 [RFC] [PATCH] Optimize TCP sendmsg in favour of fast devices? Krishna Kumar
2010-01-15 8:36 ` David Miller
2010-01-15 8:50 ` Simon Kagstrom
2010-01-15 8:52 ` David Miller
2010-01-15 9:00 ` Simon Kagstrom
2010-01-15 9:04 ` David Miller
2010-01-15 9:03 ` Krishna Kumar2
[not found] ` <OF1B0853DD.2824263E-ON652576AC.002FA9D4-652576AC.0030AC47@LocalDomain>
2010-01-15 9:20 ` Krishna Kumar2
2010-01-15 9:18 ` David Miller
2010-01-20 12:19 ` Krishna Kumar2
2010-01-21 9:25 ` David Miller
2010-01-21 9:41 ` Herbert Xu
2010-01-27 7:12 ` Krishna Kumar2
2010-01-29 9:06 ` Herbert Xu
2010-01-29 11:15 ` Krishna Kumar2
2010-01-29 11:33 ` Herbert Xu
2010-01-29 11:50 ` Krishna Kumar2
2010-01-29 20:02 ` Rick Jones
2010-01-29 19:56 ` Rick Jones
[not found] ` <OF7EA723DA.DC2FF4FC-ON652576B8.002064CB-652576B8.00267739@LocalDomain>
2010-01-27 9:42 ` Krishna Kumar2
2010-01-29 9:07 ` Herbert Xu
2010-01-15 18:13 ` Rick Jones
2010-01-16 6:38 ` Krishna Kumar2
2010-01-19 17:41 ` Rick Jones [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4B55EEC6.4070402@hp.com \
--to=rick.jones2@hp.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=eric.dumazet@gmail.com \
--cc=ilpo.jarvinen@helsinki.fi \
--cc=krkumar2@in.ibm.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.