From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Thomas Goirand Subject: Re: RFS: xen-qemu-dm (new package) Date: Wed, 20 Jan 2010 02:38:19 +0800 Message-ID: <4B55FC1B.2060106@goirand.fr> References: <4B557FF9.2090208@goirand.fr> <20100119104731.GE4780@const.bordeaux.inria.fr> <4B55C71B.2010601@goirand.fr> <20100119162427.GZ4780@const.bordeaux.inria.fr> <1263925331.2104.6.camel@Nokia-N900-42-11> <20100119173925.GC4780@const.bordeaux.inria.fr> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20100119173925.GC4780@const.bordeaux.inria.fr> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com To: Samuel Thibault , Thomas Goirand , Debian Xen Team , xen-devel@lists.xensource.com, Ian Jackson List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org Samuel Thibault wrote: > Thomas Goirand, le Wed 20 Jan 2010 02:22:11 +0800, a =E9crit : >>> That won't work either. >>> >>> Everything you are currently doing in binary-indep should be moved to >>> binary-arch, else dpkg-buildpackage -B (i.e. what buildds do) won't >>> build any package... >>> >>> Samuel >> you can try, >=20 > I did >=20 >> it does work... >=20 > It didn't >=20 >> Even though it's not very clean, binary-arch >> depends on install that itself depends on build. >=20 > but doesn't depend on binary-indep which does the actual work of > building a .deb... If you have a look at the one but the least line in debian/rules, you hav= e: binary: binary-indep binary-arch Am I still missing something here or... ? Thomas