Re: Group consensus sought on nf_conntrack_sip behavior

[Patrick McHardy <kaber@trash.net>]

Greg Alexander wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 19, 2010 at 07:39:52PM +0100, Patrick McHardy wrote:
>> Well, I'll add one final point. You mentioned the IRC helper
>> as precedent, without referring to anything concrete. You're
>> mistaken though, the destination address is fixed. But I see
>> where your misunderstanding might come from.
>>
>> What the SIP helper does is allow expectations between *arbitrary*
>> hosts when the direct_media option is off - the destination address
>> originates from the SDP payload, the source address is a wildcard.
> 
> *sigh*
> 
> I offered a DCC send from an internal host with nf_nat_irc:
>   # cat /proc/net/ip_conntrack_expect
>   289 proto=6 src=0.0.0.0 dst=98.223.156.20 sport=0 dport=4110
>                   ^^^^^^^                         ^
> 
> I offered an RTP stream from an internal host using SIP/SDP with
> nf_conntrack_sip sip_direct_media=0 (and nf_nat_sip of course):
>   # cat /proc/net/ip_conntrack_expect
>   179 proto=17 src=0.0.0.0 dst=98.223.156.20 sport=0 dport=7078
>   179 proto=17 src=0.0.0.0 dst=98.223.156.20 sport=0 dport=7079
>                    ^^^^^^^                         ^

You are obviously unable to read. Why don't you go troll somewhere else.