From: Kiyoshi Ueda <k-ueda@ct.jp.nec.com>
To: device-mapper development <dm-devel@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/3] dm-raid1: fix deadlock at suspend after suspend was interrupted
Date: Wed, 20 Jan 2010 11:47:56 +0900 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4B566EDC.5070006@ct.jp.nec.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4B5618D7.4050202@redhat.com>
Hi Yasui-san,
On 01/20/2010 05:40 AM +0900, Takahiro Yasui wrote:
> Hi,
>
> This is a patch set to fix deadlock on suspending of mirror device.
>
>
> ISSUE
> =====
>
> Suspend procedure on a dm-mirror device could cause deadlock on recovery_count
> semaphore.
>
> When mirror_presuspend is called, recovery_count semaphore is acquired in
> dm_rh_stop_recovery() to stop recovery routine, but when an signal is caught
> in dm_wait_for_completion() or an error occurred in in dm_suspend(),
> the suspend process is interrupted without releasing recovery_count semaphore
> of a mirror device. This means that another suspend is executed, and then
> the suspend process gets stuck at dm_rh_stop_recovery().
>
> When suspend procedure is interrupted, the device should work properly since
> the status of the device is not "suspended."
>
>
> SOLUTION
> ========
>
> Introduce a target handler, cancel_presuspend, to cancel status changes
> done by a target specific presuspend handler.
How about using ->resume as a cancelling method?
Though you have to audit existing targets' ->resume handler,
I think it's better idea than adding another target handler
just for this purpose.
And in your dm-raid1 patch, cancelling log's presuspend which is used
by dm-log-userspace is missed.
So it seems that dm-raid1 can use ->resume to cancel presuspend.
Thanks,
Kiyoshi Ueda
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-01-20 2:47 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-01-19 20:40 [RFC][PATCH 0/3] dm-raid1: fix deadlock at suspend after suspend was interrupted Takahiro Yasui
2010-01-20 2:47 ` Kiyoshi Ueda [this message]
2010-01-20 22:58 ` Takahiro Yasui
2010-01-21 9:20 ` Kiyoshi Ueda
2010-01-22 6:16 ` Takahiro Yasui
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4B566EDC.5070006@ct.jp.nec.com \
--to=k-ueda@ct.jp.nec.com \
--cc=dm-devel@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.