From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Patrick McHardy Subject: Re: netfilter: nf_conntrack: show helper and class in /proc/net/nf_conntrack_expect Date: Wed, 20 Jan 2010 23:43:31 +0100 Message-ID: <4B578713.6050108@trash.net> References: <20100120191824.25922.36663.sendpatchset@x2.localnet> <20100120191826.25922.78583.sendpatchset@x2.localnet> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org, flo@degnet.de, madduck@debian.org To: Jan Engelhardt Return-path: Received: from stinky.trash.net ([213.144.137.162]:46627 "EHLO stinky.trash.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752256Ab0ATWng (ORCPT ); Wed, 20 Jan 2010 17:43:36 -0500 In-Reply-To: Sender: netfilter-devel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: Jan Engelhardt wrote: > On Wednesday 2010-01-20 20:18, Patrick McHardy wrote: > >> commit 8a96ae7fda648925254899ad997d5fe3984d3cf6 >> Author: Patrick McHardy >> Date: Wed Jan 20 17:38:16 2010 +0100 >> >> netfilter: nf_conntrack: show helper and class in /proc/net/nf_conntrack_expect >> >> Make the output a bit more informative by showing the helper an expectation >> belongs to and the expectation class. >> >> Signed-off-by: Patrick McHardy > > Should not we extend on conntrack(8) instead? Yeah, I've been planning on doing that as well. Especially the expectation support is kind of lacking - it has a lot more information than those shown. But I think having this available through /proc is still useful.