From: Tim Olsen <tim@brooklynpenguin.com>
To: git@vger.kernel.org
Cc: git@vger.kernel.org, Miklos Vajna <vmiklos@frugalware.org>,
Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de>
Subject: Re: git-merge segfault in 1.6.6 and master
Date: Thu, 21 Jan 2010 11:37:17 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4B5882BD.3090908@brooklynpenguin.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <7vtyugzabq.fsf@alter.siamese.dyndns.org>
Junio C Hamano wrote:
> Tim Olsen <tim@brooklynpenguin.com> writes:
>> Breakpoint 8, write_tree_from_memory (o=0x7fffffffd560) at
>> merge-recursive.c:210
>> (gdb) list
>> 205 struct cache_entry *ce = active_cache[i];
>> 206 if (ce_stage(ce))
>> 207 output(o, 0, "%d %.*s", ce_stage(ce),
>> 208 (int)ce_namelen(ce), ce->name);
>> 209 }
>> 210 return NULL;
>> 211 }
>> 212
>> 213 if (!active_cache_tree)
>> 214 active_cache_tree = cache_tree();
>> (gdb)
>
> Are you saying write_tree_from_memory() is returning NULL? That probably
> means that in the recursive (i.e. the step that first merges multiple
> common ancestors into one) case the merge is getting conflicts. Do you
> see these "There are unmerged index entries" output?
write_tree_from_memory() is returning NULL. Stepping through the
execution in gdb shows it returning NULL at line 210.
I do not see any output, however:
$ git merge origin/deployed
Segmentation fault
$
> In the recursive case (i.e. o->call_depth is non-zero), process_renames()
> and process_entry() are supposed to be forcing the conflicts resolved,
> recording the contents with conflict markers if necessary, before the
> control gets to that point, so it clearly is a bug very specific to the
> recursive merge implementation.
Setting breakpoints on process_renames() and process_entry() shows that
they are being executed. Is there anything I can gather from their
execution that would help you?
Tim
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-01-21 16:38 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-01-20 16:17 git-merge segfault in 1.6.6 and master Tim Olsen
2010-01-20 19:13 ` Junio C Hamano
2010-01-20 21:57 ` Tim Olsen
2010-01-20 22:21 ` Junio C Hamano
2010-01-21 16:37 ` Tim Olsen [this message]
2010-01-21 18:12 ` Junio C Hamano
2010-01-22 0:21 ` Junio C Hamano
2010-01-22 0:38 ` Junio C Hamano
2010-01-21 14:00 ` Miklos Vajna
2010-01-21 21:56 ` Tim Olsen
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4B5882BD.3090908@brooklynpenguin.com \
--to=tim@brooklynpenguin.com \
--cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=johannes.schindelin@gmx.de \
--cc=vmiklos@frugalware.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.