From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mail-pw0-f53.google.com ([209.85.160.53]) by linuxtogo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1NY6ah-0006Wn-R4 for openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org; Fri, 22 Jan 2010 00:37:35 +0100 Received: by pwi4 with SMTP id 4so347969pwi.12 for ; Thu, 21 Jan 2010 15:35:13 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.142.118.20 with SMTP id q20mr1459148wfc.135.1264116913766; Thu, 21 Jan 2010 15:35:13 -0800 (PST) Received: from ?192.168.0.42? (s207-6-220-230.bc.hsia.telus.net [207.6.220.230]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id 22sm1467365pzk.10.2010.01.21.15.35.10 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Thu, 21 Jan 2010 15:35:11 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <4B58E4AD.8010406@techsol.ca> Date: Thu, 21 Jan 2010 15:35:09 -0800 From: Dallas Foley Organization: Techsol User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.23 (X11/20090817) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org References: <19c1b8a91001211410y19908564h7fe9aca3f81317ab@mail.gmail.com> <4B58D410.2020100@techsol.ca> <20100121232210.GB11015@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <20100121232210.GB11015@gmail.com> X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 209.85.160.53 X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: dfoley@techsol.ca X-SA-Exim-Version: 4.2.1 (built Wed, 25 Jun 2008 17:20:07 +0000) X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No (on linuxtogo.org); Unknown failure Subject: Re: I realy think we should upgrade PREFERRED_VERSION_glibc to 2.9 in conf/distro/include/sane-toolchain.inc X-BeenThere: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Reply-To: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org List-Id: Using the OpenEmbedded metadata to build Distributions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 21 Jan 2010 23:37:35 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Khem Raj wrote: > On (21/01/10 14:24), Dallas Foley wrote: >> Khem Raj wrote: >>> On Thu, Jan 21, 2010 at 5:32 AM, Guo Hongruan wrote: >>>> Hi guys, >>>> I think we should upgrade PREFERRED_VERSION_glibc from 2.6 to 2.9 in >>>> conf/distro/include/sane-toolchain.inc. The reasons are: >> Although I haven't tried a build from scratch in a few weeks or so, >> I have one known problem with glibc 2.9. I wonder if it's just me or >> not. glibc 2.6.1 always works. On my armv4t board gpe-mini-browser2 >> always seg faults. I've tried different gcc and binutils >> combinations. However, glibc 2.9 on armv5te (imx) or armv7a (omap) >> work fine for me. > > You could try to backport armv4t-interworking.patch from eglibc/files > that should help you will getting 2.9 up on armv4t. This patch is > applied to 2.10.1 may be moving to 2.10.1 would be better than 2.9 > IMO Ok thanks. If my line wrapping was wrong in the previous post, then sorry about that. > > -Khem > > _______________________________________________ > Openembedded-devel mailing list > Openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org > http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-devel