From: Felix Fietkau <nbd@openwrt.org>
To: linux-wireless <linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org>
Cc: Johannes Berg <johannes@sipsolutions.net>,
"John W. Linville" <linville@tuxdriver.com>
Subject: [PATCH] mac80211: fix rx data handling for non-data frames on multiple vifs
Date: Fri, 22 Jan 2010 00:36:39 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4B58E507.9000101@openwrt.org> (raw)
The loop that passes non-data frames to all relevant vifs inside the
__ieee80211_rx_handle_packet keeps a pointer to the previous sdata to
avoid having to make unnecessary copies of the frame it's handling.
This led to a bug that caused it to apply the ieee80211_rx_data state
to the wrong interface, thereby either missing the rx.sta pointer or
having it assigned where it shouldn't be.
This breaks (among other things) aggregation on some vifs, as action
frame exchages are dropped to the cooked monitor interface due to
rx->sta being NULL.
Fix this by restructuring the loop so that it prepares the rx data just
before making the skb copy and calling the rx handlers.
Cc: stable@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Felix Fietkau <nbd@openwrt.org>
---
--- a/net/mac80211/rx.c
+++ b/net/mac80211/rx.c
@@ -2348,22 +2348,6 @@ static void __ieee80211_rx_handle_packet
sdata->vif.type == NL80211_IFTYPE_AP_VLAN)
continue;
- rx.sta = sta_info_get(sdata, hdr->addr2);
-
- rx.flags |= IEEE80211_RX_RA_MATCH;
- prepares = prepare_for_handlers(sdata, &rx, hdr);
-
- if (!prepares)
- continue;
-
- if (status->flag & RX_FLAG_MMIC_ERROR) {
- rx.sdata = sdata;
- if (rx.flags & IEEE80211_RX_RA_MATCH)
- ieee80211_rx_michael_mic_report(hdr,
- &rx);
- continue;
- }
-
/*
* frame is destined for this interface, but if it's
* not also for the previous one we handle that after
@@ -2375,6 +2359,22 @@ static void __ieee80211_rx_handle_packet
continue;
}
+ rx.sta = sta_info_get(prev, hdr->addr2);
+
+ rx.flags |= IEEE80211_RX_RA_MATCH;
+ prepares = prepare_for_handlers(prev, &rx, hdr);
+
+ if (!prepares)
+ goto next;
+
+ if (status->flag & RX_FLAG_MMIC_ERROR) {
+ rx.sdata = prev;
+ if (rx.flags & IEEE80211_RX_RA_MATCH)
+ ieee80211_rx_michael_mic_report(hdr,
+ &rx);
+ goto next;
+ }
+
/*
* frame was destined for the previous interface
* so invoke RX handlers for it
@@ -2387,11 +2387,22 @@ static void __ieee80211_rx_handle_packet
"multicast frame for %s\n",
wiphy_name(local->hw.wiphy),
prev->name);
- continue;
+ goto next;
}
ieee80211_invoke_rx_handlers(prev, &rx, skb_new, rate);
+next:
prev = sdata;
}
+
+ if (prev) {
+ rx.sta = sta_info_get(prev, hdr->addr2);
+
+ rx.flags |= IEEE80211_RX_RA_MATCH;
+ prepares = prepare_for_handlers(prev, &rx, hdr);
+
+ if (!prepares)
+ prev = NULL;
+ }
}
if (prev)
ieee80211_invoke_rx_handlers(prev, &rx, skb, rate);
next reply other threads:[~2010-01-21 23:36 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-01-21 23:36 Felix Fietkau [this message]
2010-01-22 9:27 ` [PATCH] mac80211: fix rx data handling for non-data frames on multiple vifs Johannes Berg
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4B58E507.9000101@openwrt.org \
--to=nbd@openwrt.org \
--cc=johannes@sipsolutions.net \
--cc=linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linville@tuxdriver.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.