From: Jan Kiszka <jan.kiszka@domain.hid>
To: Philippe Gerum <rpm@xenomai.org>
Cc: "Mauerer, Wolfgang" <wolfgang.mauerer@domain.hid>,
xenomai-core <xenomai@xenomai.org>
Subject: Re: [Xenomai-core] Domain switch during page fault handling
Date: Sun, 24 Jan 2010 11:45:21 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4B5C24C1.3080708@domain.hid> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1264328701.2350.182.camel@domain.hid>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 7039 bytes --]
Philippe Gerum wrote:
> On Sat, 2010-01-23 at 11:33 +0100, Jan Kiszka wrote:
>> Philippe Gerum wrote:
>>> On Sat, 2010-01-23 at 11:09 +0100, Jan Kiszka wrote:
>>>> Philippe Gerum wrote:
>>>>> On Fri, 2010-01-22 at 19:08 +0100, Philippe Gerum wrote:
>>>>>> On Fri, 2010-01-22 at 19:03 +0100, Jan Kiszka wrote:
>>>>>>> Philippe Gerum wrote:
>>>>>>>> On Fri, 2010-01-22 at 18:41 +0100, Jan Kiszka wrote:
>>>>>>>>> Gilles Chanteperdrix wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> Philippe Gerum wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>> On Fri, 2010-01-22 at 17:58 +0100, Jan Kiszka wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi guys,
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> we are currently trying to catch an ugly Linux pipeline state corruption
>>>>>>>>>>>> on x86-64.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Conceptual question: If a Xenomai task causes a fault, we enter
>>>>>>>>>>>> ipipe_trap_notify over the primary domain and leave it over the root
>>>>>>>>>>>> domain, right? Now, if the root domain happened to be stalled when the
>>>>>>>>>>>> exception happened, where should it normally be unstalled again,
>>>>>>>>>>>> *for_that_task*? Our problem is that we generate a code path where this
>>>>>>>>>>>> does not happen.
>>>>>>>>>>> xnhadow_relax -> ipipe_reenter_root -> finish_task_switch ->
>>>>>>>>>>> finish_lock_switch -> unstall
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Since xnshadow_relax is called on behalf the event dispatcher, we should
>>>>>>>>>>> expect it to return with the root domain unstalled after a domain
>>>>>>>>>>> downgrade, from primary to root.
>>>>>>>>>> Ok, but what about local_irq_restore_nosync at the end of the function ?
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> That is, IMO, our problem: It replays the root state on fault entry, but
>>>>>>>>> that one is totally unrelated to the (Xenomai) task that caused the fault.
>>>>>>>> The code seems fishy. Try restoring only when the incoming domain was
>>>>>>>> the root one. Indeed.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Something like this?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/ipipe.c b/arch/x86/kernel/ipipe.c
>>>>>>> index 4442d96..0558ea3 100644
>>>>>>> --- a/arch/x86/kernel/ipipe.c
>>>>>>> +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/ipipe.c
>>>>>>> @@ -702,19 +702,21 @@ static int __ipipe_xlate_signo[] = {
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> int __ipipe_handle_exception(struct pt_regs *regs, long error_code, int vector)
>>>>>>> {
>>>>>>> + bool restore_flags = false;
>>>>>>> unsigned long flags;
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> - /* Pick up the root domain state of the interrupted context. */
>>>>>>> - local_save_flags(flags);
>>>>>>> + if (ipipe_root_domain_p && irqs_disabled_hw()) {
>>>>>>> + /* Pick up the root domain state of the interrupted context. */
>>>>>>> + local_save_flags(flags);
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> - if (ipipe_root_domain_p) {
>>>>>>> /*
>>>>>>> * Replicate hw interrupt state into the virtual mask before
>>>>>>> * calling the I-pipe event handler over the root domain. Also
>>>>>>> * required later when calling the Linux exception handler.
>>>>>>> */
>>>>>>> - if (irqs_disabled_hw())
>>>>>>> - local_irq_disable();
>>>>>>> + local_irq_disable();
>>>>>>> +
>>>>>>> + restore_flags = true;
>>>>>>> }
>>>>>>> #ifdef CONFIG_KGDB
>>>>>>> /* catch exception KGDB is interested in over non-root domains */
>>>>>>> @@ -725,7 +727,8 @@ int __ipipe_handle_exception(struct pt_regs *regs, long error_code, int vector)
>>>>>>> #endif /* CONFIG_KGDB */
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> if (unlikely(ipipe_trap_notify(vector, regs))) {
>>>>>>> - local_irq_restore_nosync(flags);
>>>>>>> + if (restore_flags)
>>>>>>> + local_irq_restore_nosync(flags);
>>>>>>> return 1;
>>>>>>> }
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> @@ -770,7 +773,8 @@ int __ipipe_handle_exception(struct pt_regs *regs, long error_code, int vector)
>>>>>>> * Relevant for 64-bit: Restore root domain state as the low-level
>>>>>>> * return code will not align it to regs.flags.
>>>>>>> */
>>>>>>> - local_irq_restore_nosync(flags);
>>>>>>> + if (restore_flags)
>>>>>>> + local_irq_restore_nosync(flags);
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> return 0;
>>>>>>> }
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> We are currently not able to test this on the system that triggers it,
>>>>>>> but we'll do so tomorrow (yeah...).
>>>>>>>
>>>>>> Should work. Famous last words.
>>>>>>
>>>>> Strike that. This won't work, because the fixup code will use the saved
>>>>> flags even when root is not the incoming domain and/or hw IRQs are on on
>>>>> entry. In short, local_save_flags() must be done unconditionally, as
>>>>> previously.
>>>> It will accidentally work for 64-bit where __fixup_if is empty. And for
>>>> 32-bit, I would say we need to make it depend on restore_flags as well.
>>>>
>>> AFAIK, Gilles is working on this. We just need to avoid stepping on
>>> 32bit toes to fix 64.
>>>
>> OK.
>>
>> Just realized that my suggestion would conflict with the comment above
>> __fixup_if. So I think we first need to clarify the various scenarios
>> again to avoid breaking one while fixing another.
>>
>> Entry over non-root, exit over non-root:
>> - no need to fiddle with the root state
>>
>
> Correct.
>
>> Entry over root, exit over root, !irqs_disabled_hw():
>> - no need to fiddle with the root state
>> - 32 bit: regs fixup required?
>>
>
> The iret emulation via iret_root needs proper fixup to have taken place,
> so doing the fixup is mandatory in any case.
>
>> Entry over root, exit over root, irqs_disabled_hw():
>> - save root state & disable root IRQs on entry
>> - 32 bit: replicate saved state into regs.eflags before calling linux
>> handler
>> - restore saved state on exit
>
> Correct.
>
>> Entry over non-root, exit over root:
>> - ?
>>
>> I tend to think that, for the 32-bit cases, we should pick up the flags
>> from the root state _after_ returning from ipipe_trap_notify and only if
>> we are truly running in the root domain then. That should be the value
>> the migration left behind, so the correct one, right?
>>
>
> Yes.
>
>> Any scenario missing?
>>
>
> Should be ok. But the more I think of it, the more I'm convinced that we
> should make the 32 and 64 bit implementation converge to the x86_64 one.
> iret_root emulation is required because we virtualize the interrupt
> masking in the assembly-written portions for x86_32, which we don't for
> x86_64.
>
> Hyste^Horically, there was a strong requirement to do that with legacy
> 2.4 kernels the 32 bit implementation was designed for, because lengthy
> masked sections would raise the latency above the top. With current
> 2.6/x86 kernels, I don't think virtualizing interrupt masking in the
> assembly-written portions makes a lot of sense anymore, since
> significant work took place upstream over time, to allow for
> fine-grained preemption there.
I'm all for this, but I think it should happen gradually. In step 1, we
should fix the current situation. Step 2 would obsolete __fixup_if by
moving x86-32 towards the 64-bit scheme.
So a discussion of my last patch would be warmly welcomed.
Jan
[-- Attachment #2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 257 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-01-24 10:45 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-01-22 16:58 [Xenomai-core] Domain switch during page fault handling Jan Kiszka
2010-01-22 17:10 ` Jan Kiszka
2010-01-22 17:37 ` Philippe Gerum
2010-01-22 17:39 ` Gilles Chanteperdrix
2010-01-22 17:41 ` Jan Kiszka
2010-01-22 17:52 ` Philippe Gerum
2010-01-22 18:03 ` Jan Kiszka
2010-01-22 18:08 ` Philippe Gerum
2010-01-23 9:59 ` Philippe Gerum
2010-01-23 10:09 ` Jan Kiszka
2010-01-23 10:12 ` Philippe Gerum
2010-01-23 10:20 ` Gilles Chanteperdrix
2010-01-23 10:36 ` Jan Kiszka
2010-01-23 11:17 ` Jan Kiszka
2010-01-23 10:33 ` Jan Kiszka
2010-01-24 10:25 ` Philippe Gerum
2010-01-24 10:45 ` Jan Kiszka [this message]
2010-01-24 11:35 ` Philippe Gerum
2010-01-22 17:43 ` Jan Kiszka
2010-01-22 17:48 ` Jan Kiszka
2010-01-22 17:38 ` Gilles Chanteperdrix
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4B5C24C1.3080708@domain.hid \
--to=jan.kiszka@domain.hid \
--cc=rpm@xenomai.org \
--cc=wolfgang.mauerer@domain.hid \
--cc=xenomai@xenomai.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.