From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Ian Kent Subject: Re: Issues with failed bind mounts in autofs 5.0.5 Date: Mon, 25 Jan 2010 11:55:17 +0800 Message-ID: <4B5D1625.3010000@themaw.net> References: <1264190553.23526.148.camel@psmith-ubeta.netezza.com> <1264206346-sup-8713@nixos> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <1264206346-sup-8713@nixos> List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: autofs-bounces@linux.kernel.org Errors-To: autofs-bounces@linux.kernel.org To: autofs@linux.kernel.org On 01/23/2010 08:27 AM, Marc Weber wrote: > Excerpts from Paul Smith's message of Fri Jan 22 21:02:33 +0100 2010: >> I couldn't find any reference to how to access autofs latest source (is >> it available in git or CVS or somewhere? > http://ftp.riken.go.jp/Linux/kernel.org/scm/linux/storage/autofs/autofs.git > > I don't remember how I found it. Last change is > Date: Tue Mar 17 11:43:40 2009 +0900 That's got to be out of date. The official location is on kernel.org at: git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/storage/autofs/autofs.git I believe that http should work OK as well as the usual git access method. So git clone git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/storage/autofs/autofs.git should get you want you need. And of course you can inspect the repo using the git web interface on kernel.org at: http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/storage/autofs/autofs.git;a=summary > > So I'm not totally sure wether this is still the correct location. But I > think not much has changed. No, that must be an out of date mirror of kernel.org. > > So yes: there should be a wiki! > > I'm still willing to spend some minimal time on putting useful online.. Yes, a wiki would be good. The truth is that I'm well and truly over creating and administering web sites so, even if we did have a place to host it, anything we do will need to be a group effort. Clearly, I would be happy to review, contribute and share (to a reasonable extent) administration. I'm fairly confident that if we requested a wiki for autofs on kernel.org that would be approved. I haven't looked into what that would mean wrt. to administration and also if it is possible for people without kernel.org accounts to carry out the administration and editing. Mainly because I didn't think we had a sufficient number of people interested in contributing time and effort. Ian