From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Ben Schmidt Date: Mon, 25 Jan 2010 11:14:39 +0000 Subject: Re: 'Not metoo' feature Message-Id: <4B5D7D1F.3080406@yahoo.com.au> List-Id: References: <4B4DDEAC.5030103@yahoo.com.au> In-Reply-To: <4B4DDEAC.5030103@yahoo.com.au> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: mlmmj@mlmmj.org On 22/01/10 3:56 AM, Morten Shearman Kirkegaard wrote: > On Thu, 2010-01-14 at 16:00 +1100, Ben Schmidt wrote: >> I think to do this properly somehow the idea of per-subscriber options >> needs to be given to mlmmj, and that's both a sizeable job, and a bit >> of an upheaval to current practice. Perhaps something to consider long >> term. > > A word of warning; I am a tiny bit conservative ;-) Understood! I will devote my mind to how these kinds of things could be done as 'unintrusively' as possible and discuss before doing any serious work. >> I've pretty much finished my survey of things I'd like/find useful in >> mlmmj now, and everything else is easier than the stuff mentioned in >> this email. I'll raise the issues over time in new threads and hopefully >> help make some patches. > > I like that attitude! I hope to see some patches from you :-) Cheers! Well, I've made a little start now, and at least two patches have been sent to the list for consideration! I really like the coding style of mlmmj, by the way. Being visually impaired, I love code which isn't full of blank lines, and lines containing only braces, or excessive comments. The code in mlmmj is nice and compact, and although comments are sparse, they are often there where necessary, and it's fairly straightforward to deduce the purpose and intent of the code. Smiles, Ben.