From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp1.irobot.com ([206.83.81.187]) by linuxtogo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1NZSCI-0007d4-Sz for openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org; Mon, 25 Jan 2010 17:53:58 +0100 X-AuditID: 0a460614-b7b17ae0000057de-91-4b5dcc150b93 Received: from webmail.irobot.com (Unknown_Domain [10.70.6.12]) by smtp1.irobot.com (Symantec Brightmail Gateway) with SMTP id D4.67.22494.51CCD5B4; Mon, 25 Jan 2010 11:51:33 -0500 (EST) Received: from fever2.wardrobe.irobot.com ([192.168.163.187]) by webmail.irobot.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.3959); Mon, 25 Jan 2010 11:51:34 -0500 Received: from [192.168.69.89] ([192.168.69.89]) by fever2.wardrobe.irobot.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.3959); Mon, 25 Jan 2010 11:51:34 -0500 Message-ID: <4B5DCC14.3030509@irobot.com> Date: Mon, 25 Jan 2010 08:51:32 -0800 From: Adam Wozniak User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.23 (X11/20090817) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org References: <4B56384B.10402@irobot.com> <19c1b8a91001211447w4892750et4414587220a70e4b@mail.gmail.com> <4B5A333D.2090400@irobot.com> <201001251102.50572.holger+oe@freyther.de> In-Reply-To: <201001251102.50572.holger+oe@freyther.de> X-OriginalArrivalTime: 25 Jan 2010 16:51:34.0167 (UTC) FILETIME=[A6E2EA70:01CA9DDE] X-Brightmail-Tracker: AAAAAA== X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 206.83.81.187 X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: awozniak@irobot.com X-SA-Exim-Version: 4.2.1 (built Wed, 25 Jun 2008 17:20:07 +0000) X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No (on linuxtogo.org); Unknown failure Subject: Re: [PATCH] added new recipe for olsrd_0.5.6-r8 X-BeenThere: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Reply-To: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org List-Id: Using the OpenEmbedded metadata to build Distributions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 25 Jan 2010 16:53:58 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit It is "revision" 8, not "release candidate" 8. If you look at http://www.olsr.org/releases/0.5/ you'll notice they ALSO have things labeled 0.5.6-rcN, but these all predate 0.5.6-rN. I think their numbering scheme through 0.5.6 is horrible. It gets worse... Four days after they posted 0.5.6-r8, they decided to break convention again and posted 0.5.6-r8-2 (and not 0.5.6-r9 as you'd expect). It is indeed unfortunate. --Adam Holger Hans Peter Freyther wrote: > On Saturday 23 January 2010 00:22:37 Adam Wozniak wrote: > >> Sorry, I've tried and tried, but I can't get send-email to work (network >> config settings which are completely out of my control). Please try >> this attachment. >> > > The upstream version number of "olsrd_0.5.6-r8" is a bit unfortunate. Is that > revision or release candidate 8? This also means that the generated OE package > will be something like olsrd-0.5.6-r8-rX". > > In case it is the release version it is probably fine but just a little bit > awkward, in case of rc we would have a small problem. > > _______________________________________________ > Openembedded-devel mailing list > Openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org > http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-devel >