From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with archive (Exim 4.43) id 1NZrkQ-0008Gg-IC for mharc-grub-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 26 Jan 2010 15:10:50 -0500 Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1NZrkO-0008CS-Cu for grub-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 26 Jan 2010 15:10:48 -0500 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1NZrkJ-00081k-OO for grub-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 26 Jan 2010 15:10:47 -0500 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=39107 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1NZrkI-0007zM-Mn for grub-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 26 Jan 2010 15:10:43 -0500 Received: from mail-ew0-f224.google.com ([209.85.219.224]:53421) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1NZrkI-0005mV-E5 for grub-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 26 Jan 2010 15:10:42 -0500 Received: by ewy24 with SMTP id 24so199931ewy.26 for ; Tue, 26 Jan 2010 12:10:40 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from :user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:references:in-reply-to :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=2QP5v0UMlJZeniWOO5GIIhy+nYhT2MpCGfB1rpr7KL8=; b=WaHJOP93c6MZt+jqxQbC6nwLC8TnXzhY1oP9XMGaex/DPChkH3Kp30tInJwJ/lQhEd 2ChJ96foCNPiHGFL2H3AxO3+e36Bm5iJsIWOgCjG8WCl8GBtJ399kYpUWPxbZjv4oNpg iBOwVtA5hcmN3wAHYLxG+B3DUJmdLz4dtdNpo= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:references :in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=GuTp39axI0adHf/6y9CsvdLEvFFiO9VeWajthQrj3flqLwPHI8z+R1/bxqMK5Bip87 F5EDM3hXWW3veRKubRsDtqrT4JkFOTNFnmpLRnQNELGSIDAiNV+gZprdYPTlf2DNntKc BNqTjg3wCdJkdwABgLdFQCe26Lemg7wMX0rcU= Received: by 10.213.23.206 with SMTP id s14mr659521ebb.77.1264536640000; Tue, 26 Jan 2010 12:10:40 -0800 (PST) Received: from ?192.168.1.50? (c2433-1-88-160-112-182.fbx.proxad.net [88.160.112.182]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id 16sm5490393ewy.2.2010.01.26.12.10.38 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Tue, 26 Jan 2010 12:10:39 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <4B5F4C3F.9000002@gmail.com> Date: Tue, 26 Jan 2010 21:10:39 +0100 From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Gr=E9goire_Sutre?= User-Agent: Mozilla-Thunderbird 2.0.0.22 (X11/20090707) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: The development of GNU GRUB References: <4B5E2B44.2060106@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <4B5E2B44.2060106@gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-detected-operating-system: by monty-python.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 2) Subject: Re: Multiboot's boot_device field specification + implementation bug X-BeenThere: grub-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: The development of GNU GRUB List-Id: The development of GNU GRUB List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 26 Jan 2010 20:10:48 -0000 Hi, > (a) set root=(hd1,2,a) ; multiboot /mbtest ; boot > --> boot_device = 0x810100ff > > (b) multiboot (hd1,2,a)/mbtest ; boot > --> boot_device = 0x8000ffff Out of curiosity, I tried equivalent commands with GRUB Legacy, and I get boot_device = 0x810100ff in both cases. Best regards, Grégoire