Re: USB host on 83xx

[Gary Thomas <gary@mlbassoc.com>]

On 01/27/2010 01:20 PM, Gary Thomas wrote:
> I have two nearly identical boards, with very different behavior.
>
> Older 8347 (PVR: 0x80830011)
> New 8347 (PVR: 0x80830031)

I lied (more precisely I was lied to and I passed it on - I've never
seen these boards in person, just worked on them from thousands of
miles away).

The boards have more than a rev difference:
   OLD - 8347EA (SVR: 0x80540011, PVR: 0x80830011)
   NEW - 8343E  (SVR: 0x80570030, PVR: 0x80830031)

Could this have any bearing on the problems?

> I've tried a number of kernels (vintages) on both with wild results.
>
> 2.6.20 - Same kernel works on both(*)
> 2.6.28 - Kernel runs great on OLD, machine check on NEW
> 2.6.32.6 - Ditto
>
> The problem occurs (only on the new silicon) during the USB host
> initialization. The root hub is found and initialized, then the
> EHCI subsystem is reset (to force it to find siblings on the bus).
> This results in a machine check at the point where the PHY is
> being reinitialized.
>
> I've peppered the driver with messages - here's what I see:
>
> ehci_hcd: USB 2.0 'Enhanced' Host Controller (EHCI) Driver
> fsl-ehci fsl-ehci.0: Freescale On-Chip EHCI Host Controller
> fsl-ehci fsl-ehci.0: new USB bus registered, assigned bus number 1
> ********** ehci_fsl_setup.272
> ********** ehci_fsl_setup.296
> ********** ehci_fsl_setup.299
> ********** ehci_fsl_reinit.257
> ********** mpc83xx_usb_setup.192
> ********** mpc83xx_usb_setup.207
> ********** mpc83xx_usb_setup.215
> ********** mpc83xx_usb_setup.220
> ********** mpc83xx_setup_phy.163
> ********** mpc83xx_setup_phy.180
> ********** mpc83xx_setup_phy.182
> ********** mpc83xx_usb_setup.238
> ********** mpc83xx_usb_setup.245
> ********** mpc83xx_usb_setup.249
> ********** mpc83xx_usb_setup.251
> ********** ehci_fsl_reinit.259
> ********** ehci_hub_control.559 - req: 8961
> ********** ehci_hub_control.574
> ********** ehci_hub_control.559 - req: 8961
> ********** ehci_hub_control.574
> ********** ehci_fsl_reinit.261
> ********** ehci_fsl_setup.301
> fsl-ehci fsl-ehci.0: irq 39, io base 0xff022000
> fsl-ehci fsl-ehci.0: USB 2.0 started, EHCI 1.00
> usb usb1: configuration #1 chosen from 1 choice
> hub 1-0:1.0: USB hub found
> ********** ehci_hub_control.559 - req: 40966
> ********** ehci_hub_control.637
> hub 1-0:1.0: 2 ports detected
> ********** ehci_hub_control.559 - req: 40960
> ********** ehci_hub_control.642
> ********** ehci_hub_control.559 - req: 8963
> ********** ehci_hub_control.805
> ********** ehci_hub_control.559 - req: 8963
> ********** ehci_hub_control.805
> usb usb1: New USB device found, idVendor=1d6b, idProduct=0002
> usb usb1: New USB device strings: Mfr=3, Product=2, SerialNumber=1
> usb usb1: Product: Freescale On-Chip EHCI Host Controller
> usb usb1: Manufacturer: Linux 2.6.28 ehci_hcd
> usb usb1: SerialNumber: fsl-ehci.0
> fsl-ehci fsl-ehci.1: Freescale On-Chip EHCI Host Controller
> fsl-ehci fsl-ehci.1: new USB bus registered, assigned bus number 2
> ********** ehci_fsl_setup.272
> ********** ehci_fsl_setup.296
> ********** ehci_fsl_setup.299
> ********** ehci_fsl_reinit.257
> ********** mpc83xx_usb_setup.192
> ********** mpc83xx_usb_setup.207
> ********** mpc83xx_usb_setup.215
> ********** mpc83xx_setup_phy.163
> ********** mpc83xx_setup_phy.180
> MACHINE CHECK - so dead it can't even print the message!
>
> At this point, it should carry on like this:
>
> ********** ehci_hub_control.559 - req: 8963
> ********** ehci_hub_control.805
> ********** ehci_hub_control.559 - req: 41728
> ********** ehci_hub_control.648
> ********** ehci_hub_control.559 - req: 8961
> ********** ehci_hub_control.574
> usb 1-1: configuration #1 chosen from 1 choice
> hub 1-1:1.0: USB hub found
> hub 1-1:1.0: 4 ports detected
> usb 1-1: New USB device found, idVendor=05e3, idProduct=0608
> usb 1-1: New USB device strings: Mfr=0, Product=1, SerialNumber=0
> usb 1-1: Product: USB2.0 Hub
> ********** ehci_hub_control.559 - req: 41728
> ********** ehci_hub_control.648
>
> You can see that it successfully found the connected external HUB.
>
> Any ideas why this happens? This [basic] code used to work (2.6.20)
> on both platforms. I know that's a long time ago, but MACHINE CHECK??
>
> (*) To get this platform to run 2.6.20, I had to patch the CPU tables
> to recognize it as 8347 (kernels of that vintage relied on the SVR to
> make choices, not PVR)
>

-- 
------------------------------------------------------------
Gary Thomas                 |  Consulting for the
MLB Associates              |    Embedded world
------------------------------------------------------------