[refpolicy] services_nut.patch

[mgrepl@redhat.com (Miroslav Grepl)]

On 12/25/2009 01:55 PM, Stefan Schulze Frielinghaus wrote:
> On Mon, 2009-12-21 at 11:14 +0100, Stefan Schulze Frielinghaus wrote:
>    
>> On Fri, 2009-12-18 at 08:53 -0500, Christopher J. PeBenito wrote:
>> [...]
>>      
>>> Was there any resolution on this?
>>>        
>> Yes, but I had no physical access to my UPS for the last two weeks. At
>> the end of this week I will have physical access again and then I will
>> check that the policy is really working fine. So I expect a
>> tested/working policy in one to two weeks.
>>      
> I take the discussion back on list. Miroslav, from the latest policy I
> did not change anything except I removed the duplicate policies for the
> cgi scripts and uncommented the *_ups_port() stuff.
>
> I'm fine with the attached policy (tested several times including a
> shutdown and cgi services). Is the policy OK for you too?
>    
I apologize, but I missed this last post from Stefan. Actually we use 
this policy in Fedora so I believe the policy is ready.

The following link includes the nut policy what we have in Fedora.

http://mgrepl.fedorapeople.org/SELinux/F12/services_nut.patch

Regards,
Miroslav