From: John Robinson <john.robinson@anonymous.org.uk>
To: Giovanni Tessore <giotex@texsoft.it>
Cc: linux-raid@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: feature suggestion to handle read errors during re-sync of raid5
Date: Sat, 30 Jan 2010 19:04:29 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4B6482BD.6090102@anonymous.org.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4B6471A1.2070407@texsoft.it>
On 30/01/2010 17:51, Giovanni Tessore wrote:
> [...] Having the OS
> recover and rewrite the sectors makes me feel back in the past, when
> under DOS we used PCTools and other utilities to do this recovery stuff
> on ST-506 drives .... and this works well on raid, but in sinlge disk
> configuration, shouldn't these be data loss?
>
> I'm confused... how much are modern disks reliable?
I think the problem is that modern discs haven't got more reliable, but
they have got much, much bigger; "modern" 2G discs had a read error rate
of 1 bit per 10^14, and current 2T discs have the same, so while on a 2G
disc you could read the whole surface of the disc tens of thousands of
times before being likely to get a read error, now it's only tens of
times. Someone did recently post links to a formal article analysing
this subject to this list, but I can't find it :-(
Cheers,
John.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-01-30 19:04 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-01-30 12:37 feature suggestion to handle read errors during re-sync of raid5 Mikael Abrahamsson
2010-01-30 17:51 ` Giovanni Tessore
2010-01-30 19:04 ` John Robinson [this message]
2010-01-30 21:33 ` Mikael Abrahamsson
2010-01-30 22:04 ` Asdo
2010-01-30 22:25 ` Mikael Abrahamsson
2010-01-31 16:17 ` John Robinson
2010-01-31 16:34 ` Asdo
2010-01-31 18:04 ` Goswin von Brederlow
2010-01-31 17:56 ` Mikael Abrahamsson
2010-02-01 1:30 ` Roger Heflin
2010-02-01 7:15 ` Mikael Abrahamsson
2010-02-01 13:33 ` Guy Watkins
2010-02-01 13:42 ` Mikael Abrahamsson
2010-02-01 15:15 ` Goswin von Brederlow
2010-02-01 16:28 ` Mikael Abrahamsson
2010-02-01 20:30 ` Richard Scobie
2010-02-02 11:06 ` John Robinson
2010-01-30 21:09 ` Asdo
2010-01-30 18:59 ` Goswin von Brederlow
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4B6482BD.6090102@anonymous.org.uk \
--to=john.robinson@anonymous.org.uk \
--cc=giotex@texsoft.it \
--cc=linux-raid@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.