From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Harald Hoyer Subject: Re: dracut version 004 tarball missing on SF Date: Tue, 02 Feb 2010 13:44:29 +0100 Message-ID: <4B681E2D.7080104@redhat.com> References: <201001301716.19360.arvidjaar@mail.ru> <4B669ACE.8090504@redhat.com> <4B6702D2.4020203@osuosl.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <4B6702D2.4020203-CJG/fkoVOTIdnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org> Sender: initramfs-owner-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org List-ID: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format="flowed" To: Lance Albertson Cc: initramfs-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org On 02/01/2010 05:35 PM, Lance Albertson wrote: > On 02/01/2010 01:11 AM, Harald Hoyer wrote: >> On 01/30/2010 03:16 PM, Andrey Borzenkov wrote: >>> GIT is tagged with 004, but there is still no tarball on SF. Would >>> somebody release it? Thank you! >> >> yes, I will.. >> >> If you want a tgz, you can always click on the "snapshot" link in the >> gitweb. >> >> http://dracut.git.sourceforge.net/git/gitweb.cgi?p=dracut/dracut;a=snapshot;h=3ee26913e7c39e0f26fc6dd9e19f6975357f37e5;sf=tgz > > That doesn't make it easy for distributions to use unfortunately. > Gentoo's ebuild system doesn't like using the tarball from gitweb as it > changes the checksum on it every time someone downloads it. I'll bump it > soon in Gentoo. > > Thanks! > uploaded