From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mail.geekisp.com ([216.168.135.169] helo=starfish.geekisp.com) by linuxtogo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1NcJ0M-0002zz-0C for openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org; Tue, 02 Feb 2010 14:41:25 +0100 Received: (qmail 4446 invoked by uid 1003); 2 Feb 2010 13:38:54 -0000 Received: from localhost (HELO ?192.168.1.167?) (philip@opensdr.com@127.0.0.1) by mail.geekisp.com with SMTP; 2 Feb 2010 13:38:54 -0000 Message-ID: <4B682AEC.7000607@balister.org> Date: Tue, 02 Feb 2010 08:38:52 -0500 From: Philip Balister User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.9.1.7) Gecko/20100120 Fedora/3.0.1-1.fc11 Thunderbird/3.0.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org References: <1265103507.19185.8.camel@balakrishnan-desktop> <201002021059.52148.holger+oe@freyther.de> In-Reply-To: <201002021059.52148.holger+oe@freyther.de> X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 216.168.135.169 X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: philip@balister.org X-SA-Exim-Version: 4.2.1 (built Wed, 25 Jun 2008 17:20:07 +0000) X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No (on linuxtogo.org); Unknown failure Subject: Re: [PATCH] regulus: Adding pxa270 based machine X-BeenThere: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Reply-To: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org List-Id: Using the OpenEmbedded metadata to build Distributions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 02 Feb 2010 13:41:25 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On 02/02/2010 04:59 AM, Holger Hans Peter Freyther wrote: > On Tuesday 02 February 2010 10:38:27 balakrishnan wrote: >> Dear OE, >> I have mailed four patches to OE dev list on last month regarding >> "pxa270 based machine" inclusion in OE(stable/2009). Can I have status >> of my patches? > > Two things, > I think one of the stable/2009 rules is that it needs to be in dev first and > will be backported then. So you would have to prepare your changes to .dev and > then ask for stable review. I don't thinnk that is a hard rule, especially since you can now commit stuff to dev that will not work in stable. However, committing the machine definition to dev is a good idea so that the machine is supported for users of both branches. Philip > > The other weird part is that I have not seen your patches on patchwork. Now > going through the archive I see your patches and they seem to be fine. > > z. > > > > > _______________________________________________ > Openembedded-devel mailing list > Openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org > http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-devel >