From: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
To: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
Cc: Simon Kagstrom <simon.kagstrom@netinsight.net>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, laijs@cn.fujitsu.com,
rusty@rustcorp.com.au, akpm@linux-foundation.org, mingo@elte.hu
Subject: Re: [PATCH] core: workqueue: BUG_ON on workqueue recursion
Date: Thu, 04 Feb 2010 11:12:57 +0900 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4B6A2D29.3010804@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20100203194350.GA13824@redhat.com>
Hello,
On 02/04/2010 04:43 AM, Oleg Nesterov wrote:
> On 02/03, Simon Kagstrom wrote:
>>
>> When the workqueue is flushed from workqueue context (recursively), the
>> system enters a strange state where things at random (dependent on the
>> global workqueue) start misbehaving. For example, for us the console and
>> logins locks up while the web server continues running.
>>
>> Since the system becomes unstable, change this to a BUG_ON instead.
>
> I agree with this patch. We are going to deadlock anyway, if the
> condition is true the caller is cwq->current_work, this means
> flush_cpu_workqueue() will insert the barrier and hang.
>
> However,
>
>> @@ -482,7 +482,7 @@ static int flush_cpu_workqueue(struct cpu_workqueue_struct *cwq)
>> int active = 0;
>> struct wq_barrier barr;
>>
>> - WARN_ON(cwq->thread == current);
>> + BUG_ON(cwq->thread == current);
>
> Another option is change the code to do
>
> if (WARN_ON(cwq->thread == current))
> return;
>
> This gives the kernel chance to survive after the warning.
>
> What do you think?
Yeah, I like this one better too. Even solely for debugging,
WARN_ON() is better as often users don't have reliable ways to gather
kernel log after a BUG_ON().
Thanks.
--
tejun
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-02-04 2:07 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-02-03 11:27 [PATCH] core: workqueue: BUG_ON on workqueue recursion Simon Kagstrom
2010-02-03 19:43 ` Oleg Nesterov
2010-02-04 2:12 ` Tejun Heo [this message]
2010-02-04 8:02 ` [PATCH v2] core: workqueue: return " Simon Kagstrom
2010-02-04 10:52 ` Oleg Nesterov
2010-02-12 8:47 ` Tejun Heo
2010-02-04 2:00 ` [PATCH] core: workqueue: BUG_ON " Lai Jiangshan
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4B6A2D29.3010804@kernel.org \
--to=tj@kernel.org \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=laijs@cn.fujitsu.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=oleg@redhat.com \
--cc=rusty@rustcorp.com.au \
--cc=simon.kagstrom@netinsight.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.