From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from proxy.dresearch.de ([87.193.137.100] helo=mail.dresearch.de) by linuxtogo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Nd1Oo-0003Cb-HI for openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org; Thu, 04 Feb 2010 14:05:38 +0100 Received: from exchange.intern.dresearch.de (unknown [192.168.32.16]) by mail.dresearch.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id BEAA0491278 for ; Thu, 4 Feb 2010 14:03:05 +0100 (CET) Received: from [127.0.0.1] ([10.32.10.2]) by exchange.intern.dresearch.de with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.3959); Thu, 4 Feb 2010 14:03:45 +0100 Message-ID: <4B6AC59A.90000@dresearch.de> Date: Thu, 04 Feb 2010 14:03:22 +0100 From: Steffen Sledz User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.23 (Windows/20090812) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org References: <4B684D9D.2030001@dresearch.de> <4B699C5A.70909@dresearch.de> <20100203162120.GB26844@xora-build.xora.org.uk> In-Reply-To: <20100203162120.GB26844@xora-build.xora.org.uk> X-OriginalArrivalTime: 04 Feb 2010 13:03:45.0850 (UTC) FILETIME=[7C10C1A0:01CAA59A] X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 87.193.137.100 X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: sledz@DResearch.DE X-SA-Exim-Version: 4.2.1 (built Wed, 25 Jun 2008 17:20:07 +0000) X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No (on linuxtogo.org); Unknown failure Subject: Re: Problem in bitbaking X-BeenThere: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Reply-To: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org List-Id: Using the OpenEmbedded metadata to build Distributions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 04 Feb 2010 13:05:38 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Graeme Gregory wrote: >>> Since today i see a similar problem when doing a clean bitbake of >>> glib-2.0. It seems to be a problem with automake/automake. :( >> >> I think i've identified this patch as cause of the problems. >> >> commit b1caa21ab2590689f3b6ff68483803701c12d721 >> Author: Graeme Gregory >> Date: Tue Jan 26 12:02:08 2010 +0000 >> > Guys there is zero point sending me emails direct if you dont actually > tell me any information. Sorry about that. But i wasn't sure if you read the ml daily. So i put you on the Cc. BTW, i would call the hint, that your commit broke[1] the baking of at least glib-2.0 (which isn't that exotic) an 'information'. [1] I've rechecked this again with angstrom distro and hipox, beagleboard, and x86 machine making a clean build of glib-2.0: rm -rf tmp.5 bitbake glib-2.0 Steffen