From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mail.geekisp.com ([216.168.135.169] helo=starfish.geekisp.com) by linuxtogo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Nd1Vk-0003Rt-7y for openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org; Thu, 04 Feb 2010 14:12:47 +0100 Received: (qmail 9375 invoked by uid 1003); 4 Feb 2010 13:10:14 -0000 Received: from localhost (HELO ?192.168.1.167?) (philip@opensdr.com@127.0.0.1) by mail.geekisp.com with SMTP; 4 Feb 2010 13:10:14 -0000 Message-ID: <4B6AC734.4090807@balister.org> Date: Thu, 04 Feb 2010 08:10:12 -0500 From: Philip Balister User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.9.1.7) Gecko/20100120 Fedora/3.0.1-1.fc11 Thunderbird/3.0.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org References: <4B684D9D.2030001@dresearch.de> <4B699C5A.70909@dresearch.de> <20100203162120.GB26844@xora-build.xora.org.uk> <4B6AC59A.90000@dresearch.de> In-Reply-To: <4B6AC59A.90000@dresearch.de> X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 216.168.135.169 X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: philip@balister.org X-SA-Exim-Version: 4.2.1 (built Wed, 25 Jun 2008 17:20:07 +0000) X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No (on linuxtogo.org); Unknown failure Subject: Re: Problem in bitbaking X-BeenThere: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Reply-To: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org List-Id: Using the OpenEmbedded metadata to build Distributions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 04 Feb 2010 13:12:47 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On 02/04/2010 08:03 AM, Steffen Sledz wrote: > Graeme Gregory wrote: >>>> Since today i see a similar problem when doing a clean bitbake of >>>> glib-2.0. It seems to be a problem with automake/automake. :( >>> >>> I think i've identified this patch as cause of the problems. >>> >>> commit b1caa21ab2590689f3b6ff68483803701c12d721 >>> Author: Graeme Gregory >>> Date: Tue Jan 26 12:02:08 2010 +0000 >>> >> Guys there is zero point sending me emails direct if you dont actually >> tell me any information. > > Sorry about that. But i wasn't sure if you read the ml daily. So i put > you on the Cc. > > BTW, i would call the hint, that your commit broke[1] the baking of at > least glib-2.0 (which isn't that exotic) an 'information'. > > [1] I've rechecked this again with angstrom distro and hipox, > beagleboard, and x86 machine making a clean build of glib-2.0: > > rm -rf tmp.5 > bitbake glib-2.0 glib-2.0 is building for me. Do you have an error log? Philip