From: "Stefan Hübner" <stefan.huebner@stud.tu-ilmenau.de>
To: linux-raid@vger.kernel.org
Subject: recovery problems, might be driver-related
Date: Sun, 07 Feb 2010 14:38:18 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4B6EC24A.9040703@stud.tu-ilmenau.de> (raw)
Hi Everybody,
I've recently come across some RAID-Recovery problem that were kind of
not-so-easy-to-understand. I was trying to recover damaged RAID5s,
where one
disk died and another dropped out (most likely due to read error recovery
timeout / not reporting back while error recovery was active) during
resync with
a spare/new disk. After taking double backups I tried to recreate the
raid with
the needed working disk images (to make the superblocks consistent). During
that action mdadm told me that the last-dropped disk contained a valid ext3
filesystem and was obviously part of an md-array.
This happened with NAS-Devices from 2 different Vendors (namely Thecus and
Synology), which made me think it must be a md-raid thing. Does md-raid
create
a filesystem after a disk dropped out? Or may something in the system
happen to
cause this strange behaviour?
All in all: after recreating the raids the filesystem contained on it was
totally damaged (could not even be mounted). fsck ran multiple days with
excessive data loss.
P.S.: the mdadm-lines to recreate the RAIDs were derived from mdadm -E -
outputs
of the original partitions, so I believe that it should have worked (on
other
recoveries I did before it also worked well).
Does anyone have an idea what is going on there? Or may it have happened -
well, I don't want to say something that could get me sued.
All the best,
Stefan Hübner
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-raid" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
next reply other threads:[~2010-02-07 13:38 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-02-07 13:38 Stefan Hübner [this message]
2010-02-08 5:52 ` recovery problems, might be driver-related Neil Brown
2010-02-08 6:49 ` Stefan /*St0fF*/ Hübner
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4B6EC24A.9040703@stud.tu-ilmenau.de \
--to=stefan.huebner@stud.tu-ilmenau.de \
--cc=linux-raid@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.