From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list linux-mips); Mon, 08 Feb 2010 18:20:13 +0100 (CET) Received: from mail3.caviumnetworks.com ([12.108.191.235]:3776 "EHLO mail3.caviumnetworks.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by eddie.linux-mips.org with ESMTP id S1492105Ab0BHRUJ (ORCPT ); Mon, 8 Feb 2010 18:20:09 +0100 Received: from caexch01.caveonetworks.com (Not Verified[192.168.16.9]) by mail3.caviumnetworks.com with MailMarshal (v6,7,2,8378) id ; Mon, 08 Feb 2010 09:19:57 -0800 Received: from caexch01.caveonetworks.com ([192.168.16.9]) by caexch01.caveonetworks.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.3959); Mon, 8 Feb 2010 09:19:43 -0800 Received: from dd1.caveonetworks.com ([12.108.191.236]) by caexch01.caveonetworks.com over TLS secured channel with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.3959); Mon, 8 Feb 2010 09:19:43 -0800 Message-ID: <4B7047AD.4010206@caviumnetworks.com> Date: Mon, 08 Feb 2010 09:19:41 -0800 From: David Daney User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.21 (X11/20090320) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Sergei Shtylyov CC: linux-mips@linux-mips.org, ralf@linux-mips.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/4] MIPS: Add TLBP to uasm. References: <4B6CA90C.1000609@caviumnetworks.com> <1265412431-28526-3-git-send-email-ddaney@caviumnetworks.com> <4B6FEE4A.6090504@ru.mvista.com> In-Reply-To: <4B6FEE4A.6090504@ru.mvista.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-OriginalArrivalTime: 08 Feb 2010 17:19:43.0469 (UTC) FILETIME=[E79271D0:01CAA8E2] Return-Path: X-Envelope-To: <"|/home/ecartis/ecartis -s linux-mips"> (uid 0) X-Orcpt: rfc822;linux-mips@linux-mips.org Original-Recipient: rfc822;linux-mips@linux-mips.org X-archive-position: 25899 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: linux-mips-bounce@linux-mips.org Errors-to: linux-mips-bounce@linux-mips.org X-original-sender: ddaney@caviumnetworks.com Precedence: bulk X-list: linux-mips Sergei Shtylyov wrote: > Hello. > > David Daney wrote: > >> The soon to follow Read Inhibit/eXecute Inhibit patch needs TLBP >> > > But you're adding TLBR support, not TLBP? > Right. I am making more changes to this patch set and will correct that. Thanks, David Daney