From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: =?UTF-8?B?UGF3ZcWCIFN0YXN6ZXdza2k=?= Subject: Re: [Bugme-new] [Bug 15239] New: Problem with network performance after a while. Date: Tue, 09 Feb 2010 08:46:02 +0100 Message-ID: <4B7112BA.2020700@itcare.pl> References: <20100208141513.b5d0be56.akpm@linux-foundation.org> <20100208.145531.143618406.davem@davemloft.net> <4B710C93.9010603@itcare.pl> <1265700977.4236.127.camel@edumazet-laptop> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE Cc: David Miller , akpm@linux-foundation.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org, e1000-devel@lists.sourceforge.net, bugzilla-daemon@bugzilla.kernel.org, bugme-daemon@bugzilla.kernel.org, jeffrey.t.kirsher@intel.com, jesse.brandeburg@intel.com, bruce.w.allan@intel.com, alexander.h.duyck@intel.com, peter.p.waskiewicz.jr@intel.com, john.ronciak@intel.com, pstaszewski@artcom.pl, stable@kernel.org To: Eric Dumazet Return-path: Received: from r242-20.iq.pl ([86.111.242.20]:49302 "EHLO smtp.iq.pl" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752691Ab0BIHp6 (ORCPT ); Tue, 9 Feb 2010 02:45:58 -0500 In-Reply-To: <1265700977.4236.127.camel@edumazet-laptop> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: W dniu 2010-02-09 08:36, Eric Dumazet pisze: > Le mardi 09 f=C3=A9vrier 2010 =C3=A0 08:19 +0100, Pawe=C5=82 Staszews= ki a =C3=A9crit : > =20 >> W dniu 2010-02-08 23:55, David Miller pisze: >> =20 >>> From: Andrew Morton >>> Date: Mon, 8 Feb 2010 14:15:13 -0800 >>> >>> >>> =20 >>>> That would be bad. That's a regression in 2.6.33-rc, and we've >>>> backported that regression into 2.6.32.x -stable. >>>> >>>> =20 >>> Luckily we have a fix already. :-) >>> >>> =20 >> Yes - i make bugreport and after i write also here on the list >> >> And Eric Dumazet help to solve problem with "route cache" - and lock= ing >> load on one cpu after information about "route cache disabled". >> >> After his patch i don't see any errors in dmesg. >> >> =20 > OK, but this is real old bug (since 2.6.24), not a 2.6.32/2.6.33 > regression... > > You were just lucky not hitting it before, probably because you tried > different settings. > > > =20 Yes i think it was all about change of settings. I start to search what settings will be the best - with some experiment= s=20 - about what will happen if.... > -- > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in > the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html > > > =20