From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mx1.redhat.com (ext-mx04.extmail.prod.ext.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.110.8]) by int-mx08.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o1ADuK01007725 for ; Wed, 10 Feb 2010 08:56:20 -0500 Received: from Ishtar.sc.tlinx.org (ishtar.tlinx.org [64.81.245.74]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o1ADu8iu017568 for ; Wed, 10 Feb 2010 08:56:08 -0500 Received: from [192.168.3.12] (Athenae [192.168.3.12]) by Ishtar.sc.tlinx.org (8.14.3/8.14.3/SuSE Linux 0.8) with ESMTP id o1ADu5XQ022864 for ; Wed, 10 Feb 2010 05:56:08 -0800 Message-ID: <4B72BAF5.9090005@tlinx.org> Date: Wed, 10 Feb 2010 05:56:05 -0800 From: "Linda A. Walsh" MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <1265793636.27966.3@raydesk1.bettercgi.com> In-Reply-To: <1265793636.27966.3@raydesk1.bettercgi.com> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [linux-lvm] lvextend docmentation vs. implementation (lvm2-2.02.39), Suse-11.1 Reply-To: LVM general discussion and development List-Id: LVM general discussion and development List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format="flowed" To: LVM general discussion and development Ray Morris wrote: >> It fails with: Invalid argument +5%LV > > You'd need to send the WHOLE command line you used > in order for us debug it for you, not just a couple of > characters from it. That is, however, enough to see > a couple of problems you have. This document may help > you solve two of your problems: > https://www.bettercgi.com/gpl/smart-questions.html ---- Sorry -- I was using it with capital "L" not lower case...didn't know there were two separate switches... my bad. thanks, -linda