From: Avi Kivity <avi@redhat.com>
To: Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@redhat.com>
Cc: kvm@vger.kernel.org, quintela@redhat.com,
Gleb Natapov <gleb@redhat.com>, Alexander Graf <agraf@suse.de>
Subject: Re: qemu-kvm: do not allow vcpu stop with in progress PIO
Date: Wed, 10 Feb 2010 18:40:11 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4B72E16B.7080704@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20100210162523.GD23089@amt.cnet>
On 02/10/2010 06:25 PM, Marcelo Tosatti wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 10, 2010 at 09:02:00AM +0200, Avi Kivity wrote:
>
>> On 02/09/2010 10:58 PM, Marcelo Tosatti wrote:
>>
>>> You're right... this should be enough to avoid a stop with uncomplete
>>> PIO (and this is what happens for MMIO already). The signal will not
>>> be dequeued, so KVM will complete_pio and exit before entering with
>>> -EAGAIN. Please review and queue for stable.
>>>
>>>
>> Not right enough. This is very fragile, we depend on the kernel
>> noticing the signal after completing pio but before starting
>> execution. I don't think we guarantee that.
>>
> As long as the signal is blocked, we do (and for older kernels too).
>
I meant, that was not an intentional part of the design, but rather a
side effect of the implementation. We can pretend it was all part of a
master plan and document it, though.
>> Maybe we should turn complete_pio/complete_mmio to an ioctl, so that
>> we can control what happens exactly. Or maybe it's simplest to
>> document it as a feature and guarantee it. There's some merit in it
>> - only guest execution is the nonatomic part, so we only interrupt
>> that.
>>
> Right. So would you like a patch to x86.c to comment on this, on top of
> complete_pio / mmio completion?
>
Documentation/kvm/api.txt. Note it's not x86 specific. Alex, can you
check if ppc complies?
>>> qemu upstream needs a bit more work.
>>>
>> Could be as simple as raising a blocked exception that is unmasked
>> by kvm, then entering the guest.
>>
> The vcpu inner loop is not atomic in upstream as it is in qemu-kvm. It
> breaks out to process pending events way too easily.
>
Hmm. We can add an explicit call to KVM_RUN.
Note we need to loop there. My 16-byte mmio patches (which never saw
the light of day) split 16-byte mmios into two 8-byte mmios issued back
to back, and we have to be prepared for that eventuality.
--
error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-02-10 16:40 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-01-28 19:03 [patch 0/3] save/restore in-progress PIO Marcelo Tosatti
2010-01-28 19:03 ` [patch 1/3] KVM: x86: add ioctls to get/set PIO state Marcelo Tosatti
2010-02-04 19:16 ` Avi Kivity
2010-02-04 21:36 ` Marcelo Tosatti
2010-02-04 21:46 ` Avi Kivity
2010-02-04 22:12 ` Marcelo Tosatti
2010-02-04 22:45 ` Marcelo Tosatti
2010-02-08 22:41 ` Marcelo Tosatti
2010-02-09 6:38 ` Avi Kivity
2010-02-09 18:23 ` Marcelo Tosatti
2010-02-09 20:58 ` qemu-kvm: do not allow vcpu stop with in progress PIO Marcelo Tosatti
2010-02-10 7:02 ` Avi Kivity
2010-02-10 16:25 ` Marcelo Tosatti
2010-02-10 16:40 ` Avi Kivity [this message]
2010-02-10 16:52 ` Alexander Graf
2010-02-10 17:01 ` Avi Kivity
2010-02-10 17:03 ` Alexander Graf
2010-02-10 17:08 ` Avi Kivity
2010-02-10 17:07 ` Gleb Natapov
2010-02-10 17:08 ` Avi Kivity
2010-02-13 18:10 ` KVM: add doc note about PIO/MMIO completion API Marcelo Tosatti
2010-02-14 8:17 ` Avi Kivity
2010-02-17 9:22 ` Avi Kivity
2010-02-18 13:24 ` qemu-kvm: do not allow vcpu stop with in progress PIO Avi Kivity
2010-01-28 19:03 ` [patch 2/3] uqmaster: save/restore pio state Marcelo Tosatti
2010-01-28 19:03 ` [patch 3/3] uqmaster: save/restore PIO page Marcelo Tosatti
2010-01-28 20:24 ` Anthony Liguori
2010-01-28 21:10 ` Marcelo Tosatti
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4B72E16B.7080704@redhat.com \
--to=avi@redhat.com \
--cc=agraf@suse.de \
--cc=gleb@redhat.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mtosatti@redhat.com \
--cc=quintela@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.