From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Message-ID: <4B74389A.80300@domain.hid> Date: Thu, 11 Feb 2010 18:04:26 +0100 From: Gilles Chanteperdrix MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <4B72A7E2.5020001@domain.hid> <4B72A9DA.1090104@domain.hid> <4B730A04.9040908@domain.hid> <4B731608.6010803@domain.hid> <4B73180C.6070301@domain.hid> <4B73207C.6020400@domain.hid> <4B73218A.9080306@domain.hid> <4B7323D5.1040804@domain.hid> <4B732487.50103@domain.hid> <4B732679.4030306@domain.hid> <4B73278F.9050603@domain.hid> <4B73C214.3010107@domain.hid> <4B73C421.1020200@domain.hid> <4B73CFD9.6010904@domain.hid> <4B73D202.5050004@domain.hid> <4B73DDC9.2020906@domain.hid> <4B73E421.3050708@domain.hid> <4B7410BB.5010809@domain.hid> <4B742963.5010301@domain.hid> <4B742CAC.8040202@domain.hid> <4B742D5A.10105@domain.hid> <4B743359.8030709@domain.hid> In-Reply-To: <4B743359.8030709@domain.hid> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [Xenomai-core] [Xenomai-git] Jan Kiszka : Make xnarch_init_timeconv an uninlined weak function List-Id: Xenomai life and development List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Jan Kiszka Cc: Xenomai core Jan Kiszka wrote: > Gilles Chanteperdrix wrote: >> Jan Kiszka wrote: >>> Gilles Chanteperdrix wrote: >>>> Jan Kiszka wrote: >>>>> And instantly - you forget about dlopen scenarios which triggered the >>>>> bug in timeconv. >>>> I do not see why dlopen would trigger a bug. Could you explain it? >>> If you dlopen, say, libnative and call a symbol that uses some timeconv >>> constants, you have to make sure that the init code of libnative >>> initializes those variables that are later used. >> That is where I do not follow you. dlopen is called after the startup of >> the other libs, so either it references its own variables, which are >> initialized once its constructor has been called. Or it references the >> variables of the posix lib (only native and posix use timeconv in >> user-space) which is already initialized. > > In this case, dlopen was part of some constructor, and the ordering > turned out to be "unfortunate". Ok. Got it now. Will test your patch, but I will probably leave the weak attribute to the shared functions. -- Gilles.