From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Thomas Goirand Subject: Re: DomU as Dom0? Date: Fri, 12 Feb 2010 15:46:34 +0800 Message-ID: <4B75075A.4090909@goirand.fr> References: <529a12f41002111143t6f41924ey46e4ef940d7c9969@mail.gmail.com> <1265924495.9385.84.camel@agari.van.xensource.com> <529a12f41002112223j4bd55064y427cdb9dc84315f6@mail.gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <529a12f41002112223j4bd55064y427cdb9dc84315f6@mail.gmail.com> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com To: "xen-devel@lists.xensource.com" , Xen List List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org Sassy Natan wrote: > OK, > > Thanks for the answers > > Sassy > > On Thu, Feb 11, 2010 at 11:41 PM, Daniel Stodden > > wrote: > If you're rather looking for recursive virtualization, I don't think > that's going to fly all that well either. > > Daniel It's called "nested virtualization" (not recursive) and there was a talk about it on the last Xen Summit in Shanghai. I suggest you to read the video: http://www.xen.org/files/xensummit_intel09/xensummit-nested-virt.pdf http://www.xen.org/media/Movies/XenSummitAsia09/2009-11-19-afternoon/NestedVirtualization.MTS Thomas