From: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org, shaharh@gmail.com, kwolf@redhat.com
Subject: [Qemu-devel] Re: Qemu does not pass pressed caps lock to client
Date: Fri, 12 Feb 2010 13:39:32 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4B754C04.4080907@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <b0ae6fcc1002120309ya8e9160p414e94d9875c7956@mail.gmail.com>
On 02/12/2010 12:09 PM, Shahar Havivi wrote:
> It's not true that SDL is not sending up event like the comment say,
>
> On Fedora 12 it behave like a toggle button, first press/release will send
> caps-down event second press/release send caps-up event
>
> On Ubuntu 9.10 it work like any other key, i.e. pressing caps will generate two
> events down and up.
True. To see why, start at
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=317010 and
http://archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/pool/main/libs/libsdl1.2/libsdl1.2_1.2.13-4ubuntu4.diff.gz
-- it's a nice code reading exercise, so I'll suggest a possible
solution before pointing out the reason for this behavior. The solution
would be to put hack after hack, i.e. something like this (untested):
case 0x3a: /* caps lock */
/* SDL will usually send only 2 events instead of 4, so we
generate the missing ones. However, on Debian/Ubuntu
systems it may generate 4; in this case we have to discard
the extra events. On Debian/Ubuntu ev->key.keysym.mod
will always be zero, but for other systems we need the
complicated condition below. */
if ((ev->key.keysym.mod & KMOD_CAPS) ==
(ev->type == SDL_KEYDOWN ? KMOD_CAPS : 0)) {
kbd_put_keycode(keycode);
kbd_put_keycode(keycode | 0x80);
}
return;
case 0x45: /* num lock */
/* Same as above. */
if ((ev->key.keysym.mod & KMOD_NUM) ==
(ev->type == SDL_KEYDOWN ? KMOD_NUM : 0)) {
kbd_put_keycode(keycode);
kbd_put_keycode(keycode | 0x80);
}
return;
Now, the solution of the riddle. The patch was correctly submitted as
+ SDL_UseLockKeys = getenv ("SDL_DISABLE_LOCK_KEYS") == NULL;
...
+ use_lock_keys = SDL_UseLockKeys;
...
+ if (!use_lock_keys)
+ break;
(i.e. by default do not change anything) but the maintainer apparently
morphed it into
+ SDL_UseLockKeys = getenv("SDL_DISABLE_LOCK_KEYS");
...
+ use_lock_keys = ( SDL_UseLockKeys && *SDL_UseLockKeys );
...
+ if ( ! use_lock_keys )
+ break;
which changed the default and the meaning of SDL_DISABLE_LOCK_KEYS.
I initially thought about removing the caps lock/num lock hack
altogether and add the following, however it would need SDL 1.2.14
because SDL_NO_LOCK_KEYS support was added exactly two months after
1.2.13 was released. :-( :-(
/* There are two versions around of a Debian patch that changes the
way Caps Lock and Num Lock are handled. The first version
by default sends only one of the KeyDown/KeyUp events, unless
SDL_DISABLE_LOCK_KEYS is present in the environment. The second
version instead by default sends both events, unless
SDL_DISABLE_LOCK_KEYS is present and not empty. This version
is the most commonly found (and a totally braindead idea).
Upstream instead supports SDL_NO_LOCK_KEYS which, if set to 1,
will generate all four events---which is what we want. Luckily,
there is a combination of environment variable that will satisfy
all variant. */
putenv ("SDL_DISABLE_LOCK_KEYS", "");
putenv ("SDL_NO_LOCK_KEYS", "1");
Yes, I love Debian.
Paolo
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-02-12 12:39 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-02-11 21:13 [Qemu-devel] Qemu does not pass pressed caps lock to client Shahar Havivi
2010-02-12 9:54 ` Kevin Wolf
2010-02-12 11:09 ` Shahar Havivi
2010-02-12 11:43 ` Kevin Wolf
2010-02-12 12:39 ` Paolo Bonzini [this message]
2010-02-12 15:15 ` [Qemu-devel] " Anthony Liguori
2010-02-12 18:17 ` Paolo Bonzini
2010-02-12 18:44 ` Anthony Liguori
2010-02-12 20:49 ` Dustin Kirkland
2010-02-13 11:21 ` Paolo Bonzini
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4B754C04.4080907@redhat.com \
--to=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=kwolf@redhat.com \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
--cc=shaharh@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.