From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jeremy Fitzhardinge Subject: Re: pvops netconsole Date: Fri, 12 Feb 2010 15:09:12 -0800 Message-ID: <4B75DF98.3070307@goop.org> References: <20100205111507.4e7089fd@daedalus> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20100205111507.4e7089fd@daedalus> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com To: Brad Plant Cc: "xen-devel@lists.xensource.com" List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org On 02/04/2010 04:15 PM, Brad Plant wrote: > Initialising Xen virtual ethernet driver. > blkfront: xvda1: barriers enabled > netconsole: local port 11111 > netconsole: local IP 10.20.40.2 > netconsole: interface eth1 > netconsole: remote port 9514 > netconsole: remote IP 10.20.50.2 > netconsole: remote ethernet address 00:16:3e:00:50:02 > netconsole: eth1 doesn't support polling, aborting. > netconsole: cleaning up > The xen-netfront device doesn't support the polling interface that netconsole relies on. It probably wouldn't be too hard to add that capability if you want to. It's independent of the backend and/or the actual underlying hardware device. J