All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Cong Wang <amwang@redhat.com>
To: Octavian Purdila <opurdila@ixiacom.com>
Cc: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>,
	netdev@vget.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Neil Horman <nhorman@tuxdriver.com>,
	Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [net-next PATCH v3 0/3] net: reserve ports for applications using fixed port numbers
Date: Mon, 15 Feb 2010 20:36:24 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4B793FC8.1050905@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1265854160-11763-1-git-send-email-opurdila@ixiacom.com>

Octavian Purdila wrote:
> This patch series is based on Amerigo's v2 but it now uses a bitmap
> for port reservation.
> 
> I've ran a while (1) { bind(0) } test (with ip_local_port_range
> 1024 65000) to see if there is any performance difference between the
> two approaches (ranges vs bitmap). I could not detect any significant
> difference, both cases scored in 2.76s +/- 0.01 on my setup.
> 
> I've based this patch series on current net-next, but it contains a
> significant non networking part. Please let me know if I should handle
> this differently.
> 
> Octavian Purdila (3):
>   sysctl: refactor integer handling proc code
>   sysctl: add proc_dobitmap
>   net: reserve ports for applications using fixed port numbers
> 

(Sorry for the delay, we are having Chinese new year here.)

Thanks for your work, Octavian!

Your patches look nice, but I don't have much time to review them today,
I will have a detailed look tomorrow.

Thanks.

  parent reply	other threads:[~2010-02-15 12:33 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2010-02-11  2:09 [net-next PATCH v3 0/3] net: reserve ports for applications using fixed port numbers Octavian Purdila
2010-02-11  2:09 ` [net-next PATCH v3 1/3] sysctl: refactor integer handling proc code Octavian Purdila
2010-02-11  2:09 ` [net-next PATCH v3 2/3] sysctl: add proc_dobitmap Octavian Purdila
2010-02-11  2:09 ` [net-next PATCH v3 3/3] net: reserve ports for applications using fixed port numbers Octavian Purdila
2010-02-15 12:36 ` Cong Wang [this message]
2010-02-15 12:39 ` [net-next PATCH v3 0/3] " Cong Wang
2010-02-15 12:37   ` Octavian Purdila
2010-02-15 12:48     ` Cong Wang
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2010-02-11  2:55 Octavian Purdila

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4B793FC8.1050905@redhat.com \
    --to=amwang@redhat.com \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=eric.dumazet@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=netdev@vget.kernel.org \
    --cc=nhorman@tuxdriver.com \
    --cc=opurdila@ixiacom.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.