All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Cong Wang <amwang@redhat.com>
To: Octavian Purdila <opurdila@ixiacom.com>
Cc: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>,
	Linux Kernel Network Developers <netdev@vger.kernel.org>,
	Linux Kernel Developers <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Neil Horman <nhorman@tuxdriver.com>,
	Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com>,
	"Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@xmission.com>
Subject: Re: [net-next PATCH v5 0/3] net: reserve ports for applications using fixed port numbers
Date: Sat, 20 Feb 2010 16:11:40 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4B7F993C.9000007@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1266532210-11536-1-git-send-email-opurdila@ixiacom.com>

Octavian Purdila wrote:
> This patch introduces /proc/sys/net/ipv4/ip_local_reserved_ports which
> allows users to reserve ports for third-party applications.
> 
> The reserved ports will not be used by automatic port assignments
> (e.g. when calling connect() or bind() with port number 0). Explicit
> port allocation behavior is unchanged.
> 
> Changes from the previous version:
> - switch the /proc entry format to coma separated list of range ports
> - treat -EFAULT just like any other error and acknowledge written values
> - use isdigit() in proc_get_ulong
> 
> Octavian Purdila (3):
>   sysctl: refactor integer handling proc code
>   sysctl: add proc_do_large_bitmap
>   net: reserve ports for applications using fixed port numbers

Hi,

This version looks fine for me, but I need to give them a test, and
I will put feedbacks asap. Thanks for your work!

Still two things:

1) bitops are always atomic on every arch, right? If yes, then ok.
2) I hope you could add some documentation to show the relations
    between ip_local_port_range and ip_local_reserved_ports.

Thanks!


  parent reply	other threads:[~2010-02-20  8:13 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2010-02-18 22:30 [net-next PATCH v5 0/3] net: reserve ports for applications using fixed port numbers Octavian Purdila
2010-02-18 22:30 ` [net-next PATCH v5 1/3] sysctl: refactor integer handling proc code Octavian Purdila
2010-02-18 22:30 ` [net-next PATCH v5 3/3] net: reserve ports for applications using fixed port numbers Octavian Purdila
2010-02-20  8:20   ` Cong Wang
2010-02-20 13:27     ` Octavian Purdila
2010-02-21  2:00       ` Cong Wang
2010-02-21  6:38   ` Cong Wang
2010-02-20  8:11 ` Cong Wang [this message]
2010-02-20 13:57   ` [net-next PATCH v5 0/3] " Octavian Purdila
2010-02-21  1:58     ` Cong Wang
2010-02-21  6:10     ` Bill Fink

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4B7F993C.9000007@redhat.com \
    --to=amwang@redhat.com \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=ebiederm@xmission.com \
    --cc=eric.dumazet@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=nhorman@tuxdriver.com \
    --cc=opurdila@ixiacom.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.