From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from us194mx009.tycoelectronics.net ([198.175.154.211]) by linuxtogo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1NjdnP-0000cd-Sb for openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org; Mon, 22 Feb 2010 20:18:23 +0100 Received: from [163.241.71.52] (163.241.71.52) by us194mx009.tycoelectronics.net (163.241.185.250) with Microsoft SMTP Server id 8.1.393.1; Mon, 22 Feb 2010 14:15:32 -0500 Message-ID: <4B82D6E0.7030005@tycoelectronics.com> Date: Mon, 22 Feb 2010 14:11:28 -0500 From: Jay Snyder User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.23 (X11/20090817) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: References: In-Reply-To: X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 198.175.154.211 X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: jay.snyder@tycoelectronics.com X-SA-Exim-Version: 4.2.1 (built Wed, 25 Jun 2008 17:20:07 +0000) X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No (on linuxtogo.org); Unknown failure Subject: Build GCC QA Issue: with objc: No GNU_HASH in the elf binary: '/home/oe/build/tmp/work/i686-angstrom-linux/gcc-4.3.3-r10.1/packages-split/objc/usr/lib/libobjc.so.2.0.0' X-BeenThere: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Reply-To: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org List-Id: Using the OpenEmbedded metadata to build Distributions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 22 Feb 2010 19:18:24 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit ERROR: QA Issue with gcc: non -dev package contains symlink .so: gcc path '/work/i686-angstrom-linux/gcc-4.3.3-r10.1/packages-split/gcc/usr/lib/gcc/i686-angstrom-linux/4.3.3/libgcc_s.so' ERROR: QA Issue with objc: No GNU_HASH in the elf binary: '/home/oe/build/tmp/work/i686-angstrom-linux/gcc-4.3.3-r10.1/packages-split/objc/usr/lib/libobjc.so.2.0.0' ERROR: QA run found fatal errors. Please consider fixing them. I get the GNU_HASH problem with a lot of packages, and quite frankly, it is really getting annoying. My project deadline is quickly approaching, and I need a compete system, even if it doesn't have some of this security stuff in it (which, is what I assume the HASH stuff is for). Is there any way to configure OE to ingore the QA stuff? The GNU_HASH is not required for a working executable is it? In this particular case, I'm trying to build a compiler to run natively on my target, so I can build some packages that have proved to be real tough to cross compile. I can't be the first one out there to try this? Has anyone else had this problem? Was this GNU_HASH stuff added somewhere along the way, because it seems an aweful lot of packages are broken by this? Thanks, Jay