From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jeremy Fitzhardinge Subject: Re: xen/next Linux 2.6.32 pv_ops dom0 kernel Date: Mon, 22 Feb 2010 12:27:55 -0800 Message-ID: <4B82E8CB.8070404@goop.org> References: <20100210153954.GA9539@phenom.dumpdata.com> <4B7731DE.8020905@swissonline.ch> <20100216181005.GC21067@phenom.dumpdata.com> <4B7B1349.9020003@goop.org> <20100217083354.GT2861@reaktio.net> <4B7C3AF8.2070000@goop.org> <20100220152942.GJ2761@reaktio.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20100220152942.GJ2761@reaktio.net> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com To: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Pasi_K=E4rkk=E4inen?= Cc: Marcial Rion , xen-devel@lists.xensource.com, Stefano Stabellini , Samuel Thibault , Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org On 02/20/2010 07:29 AM, Pasi K=E4rkk=E4inen wrote: > I just tried the latest xen/next 2.6.32 64bit dom0 kernel with Xen 4.0.= 0-rc4 hypervisor. > It seems to build, boot and work for me. > > I'm able to run PV guests without problems! > =20 That's great news. What's your config? Are you using pvgrub? What are your block and net=20 devices? At the very least pvgrub/minios fails in very obscure ways and needs to=20 give better diagnostics. But there may also be some outright bugs in=20 there which are triggering non-deterministically... J