From: Jan Kiszka <jan.kiszka@siemens.com>
To: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: Avi Kivity <avi@redhat.com>, KVM <kvm@vger.kernel.org>,
Gleb Natapov <gleb@redhat.com>,
RT <linux-rt-users@vger.kernel.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH] KVM: x86: Kick VCPU outside PIC lock again
Date: Wed, 24 Feb 2010 10:41:58 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4B84F466.2080009@siemens.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <alpine.LFD.2.00.1002232321320.3232@localhost.localdomain>
Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> On Tue, 23 Feb 2010, Jan Kiszka wrote:
>
>> Thomas Gleixner wrote:
>>> The i8254/i8259 locks need to be real spinlocks on preempt-rt. Convert
>>> them to raw_spinlock. No change for !RT kernels.
>> Doesn't fly for -rt anymore: pic_irq_update runs under this raw lock and
>> calls kvm_vcpu_kick which tries to wake_up some thread -> scheduling
>> while atomic.
>
> Hmm, a wakeup itself is fine. Is that code waking a wake queue ?
Yes, it's a wake queue.
>
>> This used to work up to 956f97cf. -rt for 2.6.31 is not yet affected,
>> but 2.6.33 should be broken (haven't checked, using kvm-kmod over 2.6.31
>> ATM). I can provide a patch that restores the deferred kicking if it's
>> acceptable for upstream.
>
> Well, at least is would be nice to have one for -rt.
>
Here we go. Haven't run kvm.git long enough over -rt yet to say that it
was the only remaining issue, but at least it doesn't complain instantly
anymore when starting a VM.
Jan
---------->
This restores the deferred VCPU kicking before 956f97cf. We need this
over -rt as wake_up* requires non-atomic context in this configuration.
Signed-off-by: Jan Kiszka <jan.kiszka@siemens.com>
---
arch/x86/kvm/i8259.c | 53 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--------------
arch/x86/kvm/irq.h | 1 +
2 files changed, 39 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/i8259.c b/arch/x86/kvm/i8259.c
index 07771da..ca426bd 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kvm/i8259.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kvm/i8259.c
@@ -32,6 +32,29 @@
#include <linux/kvm_host.h>
#include "trace.h"
+static void pic_lock(struct kvm_pic *s)
+ __acquires(&s->lock)
+{
+ raw_spin_lock(&s->lock);
+}
+
+static void pic_unlock(struct kvm_pic *s)
+ __releases(&s->lock)
+{
+ bool wakeup = s->wakeup_needed;
+ struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu;
+
+ s->wakeup_needed = false;
+
+ raw_spin_unlock(&s->lock);
+
+ if (wakeup) {
+ vcpu = s->kvm->bsp_vcpu;
+ if (vcpu)
+ kvm_vcpu_kick(vcpu);
+ }
+}
+
static void pic_clear_isr(struct kvm_kpic_state *s, int irq)
{
s->isr &= ~(1 << irq);
@@ -44,19 +67,19 @@ static void pic_clear_isr(struct kvm_kpic_state *s, int irq)
* Other interrupt may be delivered to PIC while lock is dropped but
* it should be safe since PIC state is already updated at this stage.
*/
- raw_spin_unlock(&s->pics_state->lock);
+ pic_unlock(s->pics_state);
kvm_notify_acked_irq(s->pics_state->kvm, SELECT_PIC(irq), irq);
- raw_spin_lock(&s->pics_state->lock);
+ pic_lock(s->pics_state);
}
void kvm_pic_clear_isr_ack(struct kvm *kvm)
{
struct kvm_pic *s = pic_irqchip(kvm);
- raw_spin_lock(&s->lock);
+ pic_lock(s);
s->pics[0].isr_ack = 0xff;
s->pics[1].isr_ack = 0xff;
- raw_spin_unlock(&s->lock);
+ pic_unlock(s);
}
/*
@@ -157,9 +180,9 @@ static void pic_update_irq(struct kvm_pic *s)
void kvm_pic_update_irq(struct kvm_pic *s)
{
- raw_spin_lock(&s->lock);
+ pic_lock(s);
pic_update_irq(s);
- raw_spin_unlock(&s->lock);
+ pic_unlock(s);
}
int kvm_pic_set_irq(void *opaque, int irq, int level)
@@ -167,14 +190,14 @@ int kvm_pic_set_irq(void *opaque, int irq, int level)
struct kvm_pic *s = opaque;
int ret = -1;
- raw_spin_lock(&s->lock);
+ pic_lock(s);
if (irq >= 0 && irq < PIC_NUM_PINS) {
ret = pic_set_irq1(&s->pics[irq >> 3], irq & 7, level);
pic_update_irq(s);
trace_kvm_pic_set_irq(irq >> 3, irq & 7, s->pics[irq >> 3].elcr,
s->pics[irq >> 3].imr, ret == 0);
}
- raw_spin_unlock(&s->lock);
+ pic_unlock(s);
return ret;
}
@@ -204,7 +227,7 @@ int kvm_pic_read_irq(struct kvm *kvm)
int irq, irq2, intno;
struct kvm_pic *s = pic_irqchip(kvm);
- raw_spin_lock(&s->lock);
+ pic_lock(s);
irq = pic_get_irq(&s->pics[0]);
if (irq >= 0) {
pic_intack(&s->pics[0], irq);
@@ -229,7 +252,7 @@ int kvm_pic_read_irq(struct kvm *kvm)
intno = s->pics[0].irq_base + irq;
}
pic_update_irq(s);
- raw_spin_unlock(&s->lock);
+ pic_unlock(s);
return intno;
}
@@ -443,7 +466,7 @@ static int picdev_write(struct kvm_io_device *this,
printk(KERN_ERR "PIC: non byte write\n");
return 0;
}
- raw_spin_lock(&s->lock);
+ pic_lock(s);
switch (addr) {
case 0x20:
case 0x21:
@@ -456,7 +479,7 @@ static int picdev_write(struct kvm_io_device *this,
elcr_ioport_write(&s->pics[addr & 1], addr, data);
break;
}
- raw_spin_unlock(&s->lock);
+ pic_unlock(s);
return 0;
}
@@ -473,7 +496,7 @@ static int picdev_read(struct kvm_io_device *this,
printk(KERN_ERR "PIC: non byte read\n");
return 0;
}
- raw_spin_lock(&s->lock);
+ pic_lock(s);
switch (addr) {
case 0x20:
case 0x21:
@@ -487,7 +510,7 @@ static int picdev_read(struct kvm_io_device *this,
break;
}
*(unsigned char *)val = data;
- raw_spin_unlock(&s->lock);
+ pic_unlock(s);
return 0;
}
@@ -504,7 +527,7 @@ static void pic_irq_request(void *opaque, int level)
s->output = level;
if (vcpu && level && (s->pics[0].isr_ack & (1 << irq))) {
s->pics[0].isr_ack &= ~(1 << irq);
- kvm_vcpu_kick(vcpu);
+ s->wakeup_needed = true;
}
}
diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/irq.h b/arch/x86/kvm/irq.h
index 34b1591..cd1f362 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kvm/irq.h
+++ b/arch/x86/kvm/irq.h
@@ -63,6 +63,7 @@ struct kvm_kpic_state {
struct kvm_pic {
raw_spinlock_t lock;
+ bool wakeup_needed;
unsigned pending_acks;
struct kvm *kvm;
struct kvm_kpic_state pics[2]; /* 0 is master pic, 1 is slave pic */
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-02-24 9:42 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-02-17 14:00 [patch] x86: kvm: Convert i8254/i8259 locks to raw_spinlocks Thomas Gleixner
2010-02-18 9:12 ` Jan Kiszka
2010-02-18 9:20 ` Avi Kivity
2010-02-18 9:40 ` Jan Kiszka
2010-02-18 9:45 ` Avi Kivity
2010-02-18 9:49 ` Jan Kiszka
2010-02-18 9:53 ` Avi Kivity
2010-02-18 9:50 ` Avi Kivity
2010-02-18 10:05 ` Jan Kiszka
2010-02-18 10:18 ` Avi Kivity
2010-02-19 1:14 ` Marcelo Tosatti
2010-02-18 9:19 ` Avi Kivity
2010-02-23 19:18 ` Jan Kiszka
2010-02-23 22:23 ` Thomas Gleixner
2010-02-24 9:41 ` Jan Kiszka [this message]
2010-02-24 9:48 ` [PATCH] KVM: x86: Kick VCPU outside PIC lock again Avi Kivity
2010-02-24 9:54 ` Jan Kiszka
2010-02-24 10:04 ` Avi Kivity
2010-02-24 10:13 ` Jan Kiszka
2010-02-24 10:17 ` Avi Kivity
2010-02-24 10:22 ` Jan Kiszka
2010-02-24 10:27 ` Avi Kivity
2010-02-24 10:31 ` Jan Kiszka
2010-02-24 10:28 ` Jan Kiszka
2010-02-24 10:41 ` Avi Kivity
2010-02-24 11:42 ` Jan Kiszka
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4B84F466.2080009@siemens.com \
--to=jan.kiszka@siemens.com \
--cc=avi@redhat.com \
--cc=gleb@redhat.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-rt-users@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.