All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@redhat.com>
To: Guennadi Liakhovetski <g.liakhovetski@gmx.de>
Cc: LMML <linux-media@vger.kernel.org>,
	helmut@helmutauer.de, moinejf@free.fr, m-karicheri2@ti.com,
	pboettcher@dibcom.fr, tobias.lorenz@gmx.net, awalls@radix.net,
	khali@linux-fr.org, hdegoede@redhat.com, abraham.manu@gmail.com,
	davidtlwong@gmail.com, stoth@kernellabs.com
Subject: Re: Status of the patches under review (29 patches)
Date: Wed, 24 Feb 2010 09:57:48 -0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4B85224C.7080206@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.64.1002240807100.4741@axis700.grange>

Guennadi Liakhovetski wrote:
> Hi Mauro
> 
> On Wed, 24 Feb 2010, Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote:
> 
>> Hi,
>>
>> I suspect that Linus should be releasing the 2.6.33 kernel any time soon,
>> so the next merge window is about to open. I've handled already everything
>> on my pending queues. However, I missed some emails due to a crash on my 
>> exim filter. Also, patchwork.kernel.org missed some emails due to some
>> trouble there. So, maybe there are still some unnoticed pending stuff.
> 
> Looks like you missed about two of my pull requests.
> 
>> If you still have any pending work for 2.6.34 that aren't merged nor
>> are under review, please submit it ASAP, as patches received after the 
>> release of 2.6.33 will likely be postponed to 2.6.35.
> 
> Namely:
> 
>> 		== soc_camera patches - Waiting Guennadi <g.liakhovetski@gmx.de> submission/review == 
>>
>> Feb, 9 2010: mt9t031: use runtime pm support to restore ADDRESS_MODE registers      http://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/77997
> 
> This one depends on my runtime-pm patch (which is not listed here btw), 
> which we didn't come to a consensus about, so, I think, I'll just push 
> both of them and let you decide whether or not to pull.

Yes, please do it. I'll keep it as "under review" for now.

> 
>> Feb,19 2010: v4l: soc_camera: fix bound checking of mbus_fmt[] index                http://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/80757
> 
> This one 
> (http://article.gmane.org/gmane.linux.drivers.video-input-infrastructure/16068/match=pull+soc+camera) 

This one I missed. Applying it.

> and
> 
>> Feb, 2 2010: [1/3] soc-camera: mt9t112: modify exiting conditions from standby mode http://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/76212

This patch were applied only to the fixes.git tree:

commit 2b59125b1b5f8c9bb0524b8a0bdad4b780a239ac
Author: Kuninori Morimoto <morimoto.kuninori@renesas.com>
Date:   Tue Feb 2 13:17:54 2010 +0900

    soc-camera: mt9t112: modify exiting conditions from standby mode
    
    This polling is needed if camera is in standby mode, but current exiting
    condition is inverted.
    
    Signed-off-by: Kuninori Morimoto <morimoto.kuninori@renesas.com>
    Signed-off-by: Guennadi Liakhovetski <g.liakhovetski@gmx.de>
    Signed-off-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@redhat.com>

I'll merge it back to v4l-dvb.git when merging 2.6.33, after its release.

Removed it from my queue, since it should be upstream already.

> this one are in fixes branch of 
> http://git.linuxtv.org/gliakhovetski/soc-camera.git?a=shortlog;h=refs/heads/fixes 
> which I asked you to pull in 
> http://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-media/msg16281.html
> 
>> Feb, 2 2010: [2/3] soc-camera: mt9t112: modify delay time after initialize          http://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/76213
>> Feb, 2 2010: [3/3] soc-camera: mt9t112: The flag which control camera-init is       http://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/76214
> 
> These two have been put on hold by Morimoto-san.

Ok, I think I'll keep them at the "Under Review" status.

-- 

Cheers,
Mauro

  reply	other threads:[~2010-02-24 12:58 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2010-02-24  5:40 Status of the patches under review (29 patches) Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2010-02-24  7:22 ` Guennadi Liakhovetski
2010-02-24 12:57   ` Mauro Carvalho Chehab [this message]
2010-02-24  9:18 ` Jean Delvare
2010-02-24 13:10   ` Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2010-02-25  9:59     ` Jean Delvare
2010-02-24 13:25 ` Andy Walls

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4B85224C.7080206@redhat.com \
    --to=mchehab@redhat.com \
    --cc=abraham.manu@gmail.com \
    --cc=awalls@radix.net \
    --cc=davidtlwong@gmail.com \
    --cc=g.liakhovetski@gmx.de \
    --cc=hdegoede@redhat.com \
    --cc=helmut@helmutauer.de \
    --cc=khali@linux-fr.org \
    --cc=linux-media@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=m-karicheri2@ti.com \
    --cc=moinejf@free.fr \
    --cc=pboettcher@dibcom.fr \
    --cc=stoth@kernellabs.com \
    --cc=tobias.lorenz@gmx.net \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.