From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Message-ID: <4B853245.3080603@domain.hid> Date: Wed, 24 Feb 2010 15:05:57 +0100 From: Gilles Chanteperdrix MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <4B8445C0.2010101@domain.hid> In-Reply-To: <4B8445C0.2010101@domain.hid> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [Xenomai-help] Interpreting the ksrc/arch/arm/patches directory List-Id: Help regarding installation and common use of Xenomai List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Bob Feretich Cc: xenomai@xenomai.org Bob Feretich wrote: > The ksrc/arch/arm/patches directory for xenomai-2.5.git shows entries > for Linux 2.6.28.10, 2.6.29, and 2.6.30 kernels. The release news for > xenomai-2.5.1 states that its "preparing support for the upcoming 2.6.33 > kernel", implying that 2.6.32 is the latest kernel supported. > > Am I correct as interpreting this to mean xenomai-2.5.1 supports 2.6.32 > on some architectures, but for the arm architecture 2.6.30 is the latest > supported level? Yes, ARM support lags behind. I need to work on that. We will probably skip 2.6.31 et go to 2.6.32 directly. > > Also the patches README file doesn't list the BeagleBoard as being > supported, however other news states that BeagleBoard support was added > in xenomai-2.5. Is BeagleBoard support still in xenomai-2.5.1? The beagle is supported. That is a mistake in the README, and in fact, the README should not mention any board name at all, because this is the kind of file we always forget. > > Regards, > Bob > > > _______________________________________________ > Xenomai-help mailing list > Xenomai-help@domain.hid > https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/xenomai-help > -- Gilles.