From: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
To: Oliver Neukum <oliver@neukum.org>
Cc: Yuhong Bao <yuhongbao_386@hotmail.com>,
hancockrwd@gmail.com, david-b@pacbell.net, greg@kroah.com,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-usb@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2.6.34] ehci-hcd: add option to enable 64-bit DMA support
Date: Thu, 25 Feb 2010 14:25:34 +0900 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4B8609CE.5000705@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <201002250503.09327.oliver@neukum.org>
On 02/25/2010 01:03 PM, Oliver Neukum wrote:
> Am Donnerstag, 25. Februar 2010 04:29:12 schrieb Tejun Heo:
>> Arghhh.... I hate when intel pulls this type of 'product
>> differentiation' stunts. At any rate, I'm doubtful swiotlb'ing for
>> usb2.0 would be noticeable at all.
>
> That can and should be tested.
Robert did already. Given that USB2.0 devices aren't usually used for
high-perf storage subsystem, the benefit looks marginal to me but
everyone is entitled to own opinion.
Thanks.
Thanks.
--
tejun
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-02-25 5:15 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 36+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-02-18 3:10 [PATCH 2.6.34] ehci-hcd: add option to enable 64-bit DMA support Robert Hancock
2010-02-18 4:26 ` Greg KH
2010-02-18 5:13 ` Robert Hancock
2010-02-18 5:22 ` Greg KH
2010-02-19 0:33 ` Robert Hancock
2010-02-19 0:47 ` Greg KH
2010-02-19 3:46 ` Robert Hancock
2010-02-19 3:54 ` Greg KH
2010-02-20 1:30 ` Robert Hancock
2010-02-20 4:26 ` Greg KH
2010-02-20 5:39 ` David Brownell
2010-02-20 7:15 ` Robert Hancock
2010-02-20 8:07 ` David Brownell
2010-02-20 18:13 ` Robert Hancock
2010-02-23 6:48 ` Yuhong Bao
2010-02-24 0:26 ` Robert Hancock
2010-02-25 2:28 ` Tejun Heo
2010-02-25 2:41 ` Yuhong Bao
2010-02-25 2:58 ` Tejun Heo
2010-02-25 3:15 ` Yuhong Bao
2010-02-25 3:29 ` Tejun Heo
2010-02-25 4:03 ` Oliver Neukum
2010-02-25 5:25 ` Tejun Heo [this message]
2010-02-25 16:14 ` Greg KH
2010-02-25 23:15 ` Robert Hancock
2010-02-25 23:25 ` Greg KH
2010-02-26 7:01 ` Oliver Neukum
2010-02-24 3:53 ` SB600 64-bit DMA BIOS misconfiguration (formerly RE: [PATCH 2.6.34] ehci-hcd: add option to enable 64-bit DMA support) Yuhong Bao
2010-02-24 3:53 ` Yuhong Bao
2010-02-24 4:30 ` Robert Hancock
2010-02-24 4:30 ` Robert Hancock
2010-02-24 4:33 ` Yuhong Bao
2010-02-24 4:33 ` Yuhong Bao
2010-02-24 13:30 ` Huang, Shane
2010-02-24 13:30 ` Huang, Shane
2010-02-23 6:28 ` [PATCH 2.6.34] ehci-hcd: add option to enable 64-bit DMA support Yuhong Bao
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4B8609CE.5000705@kernel.org \
--to=tj@kernel.org \
--cc=david-b@pacbell.net \
--cc=greg@kroah.com \
--cc=hancockrwd@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-usb@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=oliver@neukum.org \
--cc=yuhongbao_386@hotmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.