From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Message-ID: <4B862216.10100@domain.hid> Date: Thu, 25 Feb 2010 08:09:10 +0100 From: Stefan Kisdaroczi MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <4B856ADF.1030100@domain.hid> <4B858711.9040806@domain.hid> <4B85E29D.2000202@domain.hid> In-Reply-To: <4B85E29D.2000202@domain.hid> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [Xenomai-help] Xenomai built by OpenEmbedded List-Id: Help regarding installation and common use of Xenomai List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Bob Feretich Cc: xenomai@xenomai.org Hi Bob, Bob Feretich schrieb: > Sorry, I reused an old e-mail and forgot to change the subject line last > time. The subject line is more accurate on this e-mail. > > How can I locate this previous report? (identified below) https://mail.gna.org/public/xenomai-help/2010-02/msg00069.html https://mail.gna.org/public/xenomai-help/2009-08/msg00047.html regards kisda > I am willing to spend some time pushing Xenomai forward on this front, > but I will probably need some help. I have been involved with Linux > system building just long enough to be dangerous. Installing a co-kernel > is a new frontier for me. > > Normally, when I need to attach a new module to the Angstrom kernel, I... > > 1. bitbake the Linux system. (Kernel source is deleted upon completion.) > 2. bitbake the Angstrom kernel using the "-c compile" option, which > leaves the kernel source and intermediate files in place. > 3. Build my kernel modules within the context of the kernel. > > My theory is that the below sequence may work for Xenomai... > > 1. bitbake the Linux system. (Kernel source is deleted upon completion.) > 2. bitbake the Angstrom kernel using the bitbake "-c compile" option, > which leaves the kernel source and intermediate files in place. > 3. Apply the appropriate Adios kernel patches. > 4. Rebuild the Angstrom kernel using the "-c compile" option, which > should use the patched kernel source. > 5. Add the Xenomai sub-tree to the root file system. > 6. Build my modules as before. > > Does this make sense? > > Regards, > Bob Feretich > > On 2/24/2010 12:07 PM, Gilles Chanteperdrix wrote: >> Bob Feretich wrote: >> >>> Lately I have been using the OpenEmbedded bitbake tool to build my Linux >>> systems (Angstrom for BeagleBoard based). Has anyone created a recipe >>> set to build Xenomai under OpenEmbedded? >>> >>> What I really want to do is install Xenomai into the BeagleBoard >>> Angstrom kernel. >>> >> >> Yes, recently someone reported using this method. However, he had issues >> with -Wl,--as-needed which we did not elucidate completely. >> >>> Regards, >>> Bob >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Xenomai-help mailing list >>> Xenomai-help@domain.hid >>> https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/xenomai-help >>> >>> > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > _______________________________________________ > Xenomai-help mailing list > Xenomai-help@domain.hid > https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/xenomai-help