From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Patrick McHardy Subject: Re: netfilter 00/08: netfilter update Date: Thu, 25 Feb 2010 18:35:25 +0100 Message-ID: <4B86B4DD.6060006@trash.net> References: <20100224174927.16391.59798.sendpatchset@x2.localnet> <4B85D42E.5030304@cn.fujitsu.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: davem@davemloft.net, netdev@vger.kernel.org, netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org To: Shan Wei Return-path: Received: from stinky.trash.net ([213.144.137.162]:38214 "EHLO stinky.trash.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S933076Ab0BYRf1 (ORCPT ); Thu, 25 Feb 2010 12:35:27 -0500 In-Reply-To: <4B85D42E.5030304@cn.fujitsu.com> Sender: netfilter-devel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: Shan Wei wrote: > Patrick McHardy wrote, at 02/25/2010 01:49 AM: >> Hi Dave, >> >> following is the probably final netfilter update for 2.6.34, containing: > > 2.6.33 is just released, and Linus Torvalds said that > this merger window period is about ten-to-twelve days. > > Is it enough for us to review patch-set with title "IPv6:netfilter: defragment"? > Is there hope to merger this patch-set for 2.6.34? The networking merge window closes earlier than that. These patches are quite small however and almost classify as bugfixes, so I'm fine with them if you send them over very quickly and Dave doesn't object.