From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Message-ID: <4B8825C2.3030107@redhat.com> Date: Fri, 26 Feb 2010 14:49:22 -0500 From: Daniel J Walsh MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Eamon Walsh CC: Joshua Brindle , SELinux Subject: Re: updated libselinux pkgconfig does not work correctly on lib64 machines. References: <4B857CDE.7010303@redhat.com> <4B857F6B.7050503@redhat.com> <4B872798.4010702@manicmethod.com> <4B880E8D.5070602@tycho.nsa.gov> In-Reply-To: <4B880E8D.5070602@tycho.nsa.gov> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Sender: owner-selinux@tycho.nsa.gov List-Id: selinux@tycho.nsa.gov On 02/26/2010 01:10 PM, Eamon Walsh wrote: > On 02/25/2010 08:44 PM, Joshua Brindle wrote: > >> Daniel J Walsh wrote: >> >> >>> On 02/24/2010 02:24 PM, Daniel J Walsh wrote: >>> Ignore the first patch it was missing pc.in files. >>> >>> >> I am completely new to libtool. Does this seem reasonable Eamon? >> >> > > I don't see any reference to "lib64" anywhere in our Makefiles even with > the patch. We have "lib" hard-coded, and I just checked a 64-bit > machine and our stuff is in /usr/lib instead of /usr/lib64. Is that > what this patch is trying to solve? > > > Yes If you execute make LIBDIR=/usr/lib64 SHLIBDIR=/lib64 install It should do the right thing with the patch. This is what the spec file hands in. -- This message was distributed to subscribers of the selinux mailing list. If you no longer wish to subscribe, send mail to majordomo@tycho.nsa.gov with the words "unsubscribe selinux" without quotes as the message.