All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Jayson R. King" <dev@jaysonking.com>
To: LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Stable team <stable@kernel.org>,
	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@suse.de>
Cc: "Aneesh Kumar K.V" <aneesh.kumar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	Mingming Cao <cmm@us.ibm.com>, Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>,
	linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	Jayson King <dev@jaysonking.com>
Subject: [02/11] percpu counter: clean up percpu_counter_sum_and_set()
Date: Sat, 27 Feb 2010 00:32:19 -0600	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4B88BC73.8030900@jaysonking.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4B88BA1B.4050500@jaysonking.com>

From: Mingming Cao <cmm@us.ibm.com>
Date: Thu Oct 9 12:50:59 2008 -0400
Subject: percpu counter: clean up percpu_counter_sum_and_set()

commit 1f7c14c62ce63805f9574664a6c6de3633d4a354 upstream.

percpu_counter_sum_and_set() and percpu_counter_sum() is the same except
the former updates the global counter after accounting.  Since we are
taking the fbc->lock to calculate the precise value of the counter in
percpu_counter_sum() anyway, it should simply set fbc->count too, as the
percpu_counter_sum_and_set() does.

This patch merges these two interfaces into one.

Signed-off-by: Mingming Cao <cmm@us.ibm.com>
Acked-by: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
Cc: <linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: "Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>
Signed-off-by: Jayson R. King <dev@jaysonking.com>

---
 fs/ext4/balloc.c               |    2 +-
 include/linux/percpu_counter.h |   12 +++---------
 lib/percpu_counter.c           |    8 +++-----
 3 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)

diff -urNp linux-2.6.27.orig/fs/ext4/balloc.c linux-2.6.27/fs/ext4/balloc.c
--- linux-2.6.27.orig/fs/ext4/balloc.c	2010-02-26 14:10:41.167252303 -0600
+++ linux-2.6.27/fs/ext4/balloc.c	2010-02-26 14:18:30.811252658 -0600
@@ -1778,7 +1778,7 @@ ext4_fsblk_t ext4_has_free_blocks(struct
 #ifdef CONFIG_SMP
 	if (free_blocks - root_blocks < FBC_BATCH)
 		free_blocks =
-			percpu_counter_sum_and_set(&sbi->s_freeblocks_counter);
+			percpu_counter_sum(&sbi->s_freeblocks_counter);
 #endif
 	if (free_blocks <= root_blocks)
 		/* we don't have free space */
diff -urNp linux-2.6.27.orig/include/linux/percpu_counter.h linux-2.6.27/include/linux/percpu_counter.h
--- linux-2.6.27.orig/include/linux/percpu_counter.h	2010-02-26 14:10:41.961252665 -0600
+++ linux-2.6.27/include/linux/percpu_counter.h	2010-02-26 14:18:30.811252658 -0600
@@ -35,7 +35,7 @@ int percpu_counter_init_irq(struct percp
 void percpu_counter_destroy(struct percpu_counter *fbc);
 void percpu_counter_set(struct percpu_counter *fbc, s64 amount);
 void __percpu_counter_add(struct percpu_counter *fbc, s64 amount, s32 batch);
-s64 __percpu_counter_sum(struct percpu_counter *fbc, int set);
+s64 __percpu_counter_sum(struct percpu_counter *fbc);
 
 static inline void percpu_counter_add(struct percpu_counter *fbc, s64 amount)
 {
@@ -44,19 +44,13 @@ static inline void percpu_counter_add(st
 
 static inline s64 percpu_counter_sum_positive(struct percpu_counter *fbc)
 {
-	s64 ret = __percpu_counter_sum(fbc, 0);
+	s64 ret = __percpu_counter_sum(fbc);
 	return ret < 0 ? 0 : ret;
 }
 
-static inline s64 percpu_counter_sum_and_set(struct percpu_counter *fbc)
-{
-	return __percpu_counter_sum(fbc, 1);
-}
-
-
 static inline s64 percpu_counter_sum(struct percpu_counter *fbc)
 {
-	return __percpu_counter_sum(fbc, 0);
+	return __percpu_counter_sum(fbc);
 }
 
 static inline s64 percpu_counter_read(struct percpu_counter *fbc)
diff -urNp linux-2.6.27.orig/lib/percpu_counter.c linux-2.6.27/lib/percpu_counter.c
--- linux-2.6.27.orig/lib/percpu_counter.c	2010-02-26 14:10:42.176252671 -0600
+++ linux-2.6.27/lib/percpu_counter.c	2010-02-26 14:18:30.811252658 -0600
@@ -52,7 +52,7 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(__percpu_counter_add);
  * Add up all the per-cpu counts, return the result.  This is a more accurate
  * but much slower version of percpu_counter_read_positive()
  */
-s64 __percpu_counter_sum(struct percpu_counter *fbc, int set)
+s64 __percpu_counter_sum(struct percpu_counter *fbc)
 {
 	s64 ret;
 	int cpu;
@@ -62,11 +62,9 @@ s64 __percpu_counter_sum(struct percpu_c
 	for_each_online_cpu(cpu) {
 		s32 *pcount = per_cpu_ptr(fbc->counters, cpu);
 		ret += *pcount;
-		if (set)
-			*pcount = 0;
+		*pcount = 0;
 	}
-	if (set)
-		fbc->count = ret;
+	fbc->count = ret;
 
 	spin_unlock(&fbc->lock);
 	return ret;

  parent reply	other threads:[~2010-02-27  7:21 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2010-02-27  6:22 [00/11] fix ext4 deadlock on 2.6.27.y Jayson R. King
2010-02-27  6:32 ` [01/11] ext4: invalidate pages if delalloc block allocation fails Jayson R. King
2010-02-27  6:32 ` Jayson R. King [this message]
2010-02-27  6:32 ` [03/11] ext4: Make sure all the block allocation paths reserve blocks Jayson R. King
2010-02-27  6:32   ` Jayson R. King
2010-02-27  6:32 ` [04/11] ext4: Add percpu dirty block accounting Jayson R. King
2010-02-27  6:32 ` [05/11] ext4: Retry block reservation Jayson R. King
2010-02-27  6:32 ` [06/11] ext4: Retry block allocation if we have free blocks left Jayson R. King
2010-02-27  6:32   ` Jayson R. King
2010-02-27  6:33 ` [07/11] ext4: Use tag dirty lookup during mpage_da_submit_io Jayson R. King
2010-02-27  6:33 ` [08/11] vfs: Remove the range_cont writeback mode Jayson R. King
2010-02-27  6:33 ` [09/11] vfs: Add no_nrwrite_index_update writeback control flag Jayson R. King
2010-02-27  6:33 ` [10/11] ext4: Fix file fragmentation during large file write Jayson R. King
2010-02-27  6:33 ` [11/11] ext4: Implement range_cyclic in ext4_da_writepages instead of write_cache_pages Jayson R. King
2010-02-28  3:16 ` [00/11] fix ext4 deadlock on 2.6.27.y Greg KH
2010-03-15 20:09   ` [stable] " Greg KH
2010-03-15 20:09   ` Greg KH
2010-03-15 23:17     ` tytso

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4B88BC73.8030900@jaysonking.com \
    --to=dev@jaysonking.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=aneesh.kumar@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=cmm@us.ibm.com \
    --cc=gregkh@suse.de \
    --cc=linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=stable@kernel.org \
    --cc=tytso@mit.edu \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.