All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org>
To: "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@xmission.com>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>,
	hpa@zytor.com, garyhade@us.ibm.com, tglx@linutronix.de
Cc: linux-tip-commits@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	mingo@redhat.com, iranna.ankad@in.ibm.com,
	suresh.b.siddha@intel.com, trenn@suse.de
Subject: [PATCH -v11] x86: fix out of order of gsi -- partial
Date: Sat, 27 Feb 2010 19:47:29 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4B89E751.1060903@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <m1mxyue31g.fsf@fess.ebiederm.org>

From: Eric W. Biederman <ebiederm@xmission.com>

found IBM x3950 will have problem after

|commit b9c61b70075c87a8612624736faf4a2de5b1ed30
|
|    x86/pci: update pirq_enable_irq() to setup io apic routing

The problem is that with the patch, the machine freezes when
console=ttyS0,... kernel serial parameter is passed.
It seem to freeze at DVD initialization and the whole problem seem
to be DVD/pata related, but somehow exposed through the serial
parameter.
Such apic problems can expose really weird behavior..

<6>ACPI: IOAPIC (id[0x10] address[0xfecff000] gsi_base[0])
<6>IOAPIC[0]: apic_id 16, version 0, address 0xfecff000, GSI 0-2
<6>ACPI: IOAPIC (id[0x0f] address[0xfec00000] gsi_base[3])
<6>IOAPIC[1]: apic_id 15, version 0, address 0xfec00000, GSI 3-38
<6>ACPI: IOAPIC (id[0x0e] address[0xfec01000] gsi_base[39])
<6>IOAPIC[2]: apic_id 14, version 0, address 0xfec01000, GSI 39-74
<6>ACPI: INT_SRC_OVR (bus 0 bus_irq 1 global_irq 4 dfl dfl)
<6>ACPI: INT_SRC_OVR (bus 0 bus_irq 0 global_irq 5 dfl dfl)
<6>ACPI: INT_SRC_OVR (bus 0 bus_irq 3 global_irq 6 dfl dfl)
<6>ACPI: INT_SRC_OVR (bus 0 bus_irq 4 global_irq 7 dfl dfl)
<6>ACPI: INT_SRC_OVR (bus 0 bus_irq 6 global_irq 9 dfl dfl)
<6>ACPI: INT_SRC_OVR (bus 0 bus_irq 7 global_irq 10 dfl dfl)
<6>ACPI: INT_SRC_OVR (bus 0 bus_irq 8 global_irq 11 low edge)
<6>ACPI: INT_SRC_OVR (bus 0 bus_irq 9 global_irq 12 dfl dfl)
<6>ACPI: INT_SRC_OVR (bus 0 bus_irq 12 global_irq 15 dfl dfl)
<6>ACPI: INT_SRC_OVR (bus 0 bus_irq 13 global_irq 16 dfl dfl)
<6>ACPI: INT_SRC_OVR (bus 0 bus_irq 14 global_irq 17 low edge)
<6>ACPI: INT_SRC_OVR (bus 0 bus_irq 15 global_irq 18 dfl dfl)

it turns out that system have three io apic controller. but put boot ioapic
routing in second one. and that gsi_base is not 0. it is using bunch of INT_SRC_OVR...

recent changes
1. one set routing for first io apic controller
2. assume irq = gsi
will break theat system.

so try to remap those gsi, need to seperate boot_ioapic_id detection out of enable_IO_APIC
and call them early.
introduce boot_ioapic_id, and remap_ioapic_gsi...

-v2: shift gsi with delta instead of gsi_base of boot_ioapic_idx
-v3: double check with find_isa_irq_apic(0, mp_INT) to get right boot_ioapic_idx
-v4: nr_legacy_irqs
-v5: add print out for boot_ioapic_idx, and also make it could be applied for current
-v5: add print out for boot_ioapic_idx, and also make it could be applied for current
-v9: according to Eric, use fixed 16 for shifting instead of remap
-v10: still nee to touch rsparser.c
-v11: just revert back to way Eric suggest...
      anyway the ioapic in first ioapic is blocked by second...

Reported-by: Iranna D Ankad <iranna.ankad@in.ibm.com>
Bisected-by: Iranna D Ankad <iranna.ankad@in.ibm.com>
Tested-by: Gary Hade <garyhade@us.ibm.com>
Cc: Thomas Renninger <trenn@suse.de>
Cc: stable@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org>

---
 arch/x86/kernel/apic/io_apic.c |   28 ++++++++++------------------
 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-)

Index: linux-2.6/arch/x86/kernel/apic/io_apic.c
===================================================================
--- linux-2.6.orig/arch/x86/kernel/apic/io_apic.c
+++ linux-2.6/arch/x86/kernel/apic/io_apic.c
@@ -1465,7 +1465,7 @@ static struct {
 
 static void __init setup_IO_APIC_irqs(void)
 {
-	int apic_id = 0, pin, idx, irq;
+	int apic_id, pin, idx, irq;
 	int notcon = 0;
 	struct irq_desc *desc;
 	struct irq_cfg *cfg;
@@ -1473,14 +1473,7 @@ static void __init setup_IO_APIC_irqs(vo
 
 	apic_printk(APIC_VERBOSE, KERN_DEBUG "init IO_APIC IRQs\n");
 
-#ifdef CONFIG_ACPI
-	if (!acpi_disabled && acpi_ioapic) {
-		apic_id = mp_find_ioapic(0);
-		if (apic_id < 0)
-			apic_id = 0;
-	}
-#endif
-
+	for (apic_id = 0; apic_id < nr_ioapics; apic_id++)
 	for (pin = 0; pin < nr_ioapic_registers[apic_id]; pin++) {
 		idx = find_irq_entry(apic_id, pin, mp_INT);
 		if (idx == -1) {
@@ -1502,6 +1495,9 @@ static void __init setup_IO_APIC_irqs(vo
 
 		irq = pin_2_irq(idx, apic_id, pin);
 
+		if ((apic_id > 0) && (irq > 16))
+			continue;
+
 		/*
 		 * Skip the timer IRQ if there's a quirk handler
 		 * installed and if it returns 1:
@@ -4061,27 +4057,23 @@ int acpi_get_override_irq(int bus_irq, i
 #ifdef CONFIG_SMP
 void __init setup_ioapic_dest(void)
 {
-	int pin, ioapic = 0, irq, irq_entry;
+	int pin, ioapic, irq, irq_entry;
 	struct irq_desc *desc;
 	const struct cpumask *mask;
 
 	if (skip_ioapic_setup == 1)
 		return;
 
-#ifdef CONFIG_ACPI
-	if (!acpi_disabled && acpi_ioapic) {
-		ioapic = mp_find_ioapic(0);
-		if (ioapic < 0)
-			ioapic = 0;
-	}
-#endif
-
+	for (ioapic = 0; ioapic < nr_ioapics; ioapic++)
 	for (pin = 0; pin < nr_ioapic_registers[ioapic]; pin++) {
 		irq_entry = find_irq_entry(ioapic, pin, mp_INT);
 		if (irq_entry == -1)
 			continue;
 		irq = pin_2_irq(irq_entry, ioapic, pin);
 
+		if ((ioapic > 0) && (irq > 16))
+			continue;
+
 		desc = irq_to_desc(irq);
 
 		/*

  parent reply	other threads:[~2010-02-28  3:49 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 34+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <201002221108.42847.trenn@suse.de>
     [not found] ` <4B826CA6.7060007@kernel.org>
     [not found]   ` <201002221258.38506.trenn@suse.de>
2010-02-23  9:07     ` Other problem/regression with b9c61b70075c87a8612624736faf4a2de5b1ed30 Yinghai Lu
2010-02-23 18:40       ` Yinghai Lu
2010-02-23 20:17         ` Eric W. Biederman
2010-02-26 19:30         ` [PATCH -v8 1/2] x86: fix out of order of gsi - have right boot_ioapic_idx Yinghai Lu
2010-02-27 12:57           ` [tip:x86/apic] x86: Fix out of order gsi - have the " tip-bot for Yinghai Lu
2010-02-26 19:31         ` [PATCH -v8 2/2] x86: fix out of order of gsi -- add remap_ioapic_gsi_to_irq Yinghai Lu
2010-02-27 12:57           ` [tip:x86/apic] x86: Fix out of order gsi -- add remap_ioapic_gsi_to_irq() tip-bot for Yinghai Lu
2010-02-27 13:01             ` Ingo Molnar
2010-02-27 18:52               ` Yinghai Lu
2010-02-27 22:57                 ` H. Peter Anvin
2010-02-27 19:04               ` Eric W. Biederman
2010-02-27 19:40                 ` Yinghai Lu
2010-02-27 21:30                   ` Eric W. Biederman
2010-02-27 22:00                     ` Yinghai Lu
2010-02-27 22:18                       ` Eric W. Biederman
2010-02-27 22:58                         ` Yinghai Lu
2010-02-28  1:12                         ` [PATCH -v9] x86: fix out of order of gsi Yinghai Lu
2010-02-28  3:26                           ` [PATCH -v10] " Yinghai Lu
2010-02-28  3:47                         ` Yinghai Lu [this message]
2010-02-28  8:09                           ` [PATCH -v11] x86: fix out of order of gsi -- partial Ingo Molnar
2010-02-28  9:05                             ` Yinghai Lu
2010-03-01 14:40                               ` Thomas Renninger
2010-03-01 18:31                                 ` Yinghai Lu
2010-02-28  9:06                             ` [PATCH -v12 1/2] " Yinghai Lu
2010-02-28 19:51                               ` [tip:x86/apic] x86: Fix out of order of gsi tip-bot for Eric W. Biederman
2010-02-28  9:08                             ` [PATCH -v12 2/2] x86: fix out of order of gsi - full Yinghai Lu
2010-03-01 18:59                               ` Eric W. Biederman
2010-03-01 19:37                       ` [tip:x86/apic] x86: Fix out of order gsi -- add remap_ioapic_gsi_to_irq() Eric W. Biederman
2010-03-01 20:26                         ` Yinghai Lu
2010-03-01 16:46                     ` [LKML] " Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2010-03-01 18:37                       ` Yinghai Lu
2010-03-01 18:44                       ` Eric W. Biederman
2010-03-01 18:33                         ` [LKML] " Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2010-02-23 19:02       ` Other problem/regression with b9c61b70075c87a8612624736faf4a2de5b1ed30 Gary Hade

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4B89E751.1060903@kernel.org \
    --to=yinghai@kernel.org \
    --cc=ebiederm@xmission.com \
    --cc=garyhade@us.ibm.com \
    --cc=hpa@zytor.com \
    --cc=iranna.ankad@in.ibm.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-tip-commits@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@elte.hu \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=suresh.b.siddha@intel.com \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=trenn@suse.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.