All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Mart Frauenlob <mart.frauenlob@chello.at>
To: netfilter@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: INVALID state
Date: Sun, 28 Feb 2010 12:15:27 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4B8A504F.6060803@chello.at> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4B8A4AEE.8080007@iit.bme.hu>

On 28.02.2010 11:52, netfilter-owner@vger.kernel.org wrote:
> Mart Frauenlob wrote:
>> On 28.02.2010 10:31, netfilter-owner@vger.kernel.org wrote:
>>
>>> Dear all
>>>
>>> Could someone help me to identify the difference between
>>> the following 3 rules.
>>>
>>> 1. iptables -t mangle -A PREROUTING -p tcp ! --syn -m state --state
>>> INVALID -j DROP
>>> 2. iptables -A INPUT -p tcp ! --syn -m state --state INVALID -j DROP
>>> 3. iptables -A INPUP -p tcp ! --syn -m conntrack --cstate INVALID -j
>>> DROP
>>>
>>
>>
>> take a look at this picture, to see, that mangle/PREROUTING may catch
>> different things than filter/INPUT:
>> http://jengelh.medozas.de/images/nf-packet-flow.png
>>
>> Generally filtering (ACCEPT/DROP/REJECT) should be done in the filter
>> table, unless there is a good reason (and understanding) to do it
>> otherwise (i.e. the nat table does not allow DROP).
>> The mangle table is generally meant for packet manipulation. i.e.
>> marking, changing ip settings, etc...
>>
>> conntrack supports all states that the state match does, plus some more.
>>
>>
>> More in general:
>> imho the '! --syn' is quite unnecessary, correct me if I'm wrong.
>>

> Thanks for the help.
> 

np, but please switch to bottom posting...

> Assuming that the a packet reach the 1,2,3 rules is there a
> difference regards matching between "-m state --state INVALID"
> applied in 1 and 2 rules or the "-m conntrack --cstate INVALID"
> statements?
> 

requoting myself:
> conntrack supports all states that the state match does, plus some more

so, no difference.

  reply	other threads:[~2010-02-28 11:15 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2010-02-28  9:24 INVALID state Nemeth Denes
2010-02-28 10:10 ` Mart Frauenlob
2010-02-28 10:52   ` Nemeth Denes
2010-02-28 11:15     ` Mart Frauenlob [this message]
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2008-11-13 18:16 Gilad Benjamini
2008-11-13 22:31 ` Christoph Paasch
2008-11-13 22:34   ` Gilad Benjamini
2008-11-13 23:01     ` Christoph Paasch
2008-11-12 22:08 Gilad Benjamini
2008-11-13 11:13 ` Thomas Jacob
2008-11-13 12:16   ` Christoph Paasch
2008-11-13 12:48     ` Thomas Jacob
2008-11-13 13:08       ` Christoph Paasch

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4B8A504F.6060803@chello.at \
    --to=mart.frauenlob@chello.at \
    --cc=netfilter@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.