From: Clemens Ladisch <clemens@ladisch.de>
To: Magnus Lynch <maglyx@gmail.com>
Cc: venkatesh.pallipadi@intel.com, vojtech@suse.cz, bob.picco@hp.com,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] hpet: factor timer allocate from open
Date: Mon, 01 Mar 2010 10:59:58 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4B8B901E.4050302@ladisch.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <be233a491002282130m3c637cfbw6648a77548241a64@mail.gmail.com>
Magnus Lynch wrote:
> The current implementation of the /dev/hpet driver couples opening the
> device with allocating one of the (scarce) timers (aka comparators).
> This is a limitation in that the main counter may be valuable to
> applications seeking a high-resolution timer who have no use for the
> interrupt generating functionality of the comparators.
>
> This patch alters the open semantics so that when the device is
> opened, no timer is allocated. Operations that depend on a timer being
> in context implicitly attempt allocating a timer, to maintain backward
> compatibility.
Many thanks; I had planned to do something like this, but never found
the time.
> I also have changes for adding IOCTLs to get the main counter
> value--which is more straightforward than mmaping and reading the
> registers directly, and possibly necessary if mmap is ifdef'd
> away--but have separated that logically into another patch.
This driver was written before the high-resolution timer API was
available, so the only actual use case, besides backwards compatibility,
is the ability to read the timer register directly without a syscall.
A ioctl to read the main counter would just duplicate clock_gettime(),
but I cannot see any benefit over that.
> diff --git a/drivers/char/hpet.c b/drivers/char/hpet.c
Your mailer killed tabs and wrapped lines.
> @@ -438,6 +469,17 @@ hpet_ioctl(struct inode *inode, struct file *file, unsigned int cmd,
> {
> struct hpet_dev *devp;
>
> + switch (cmd) {
> + case HPET_INFO:
> + break;
> + default:
> + {
> + int r = hpet_alloc_timer(file);
Applications might want to use HPET_INFO to find out which timer they
got, so I think the driver cannot avoid allocating a timer in this case.
Regards,
Clemens
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-03-01 10:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-03-01 5:30 [PATCH] hpet: factor timer allocate from open Magnus Lynch
2010-03-01 9:59 ` Clemens Ladisch [this message]
2010-03-01 20:24 ` Magnus Lynch
2010-03-01 20:59 ` john stultz
2010-03-03 9:07 ` Magnus Lynch
2010-03-03 16:26 ` john stultz
2010-03-10 2:47 ` Magnus Lynch
2010-03-04 2:59 ` Magnus Lynch
2010-03-04 8:43 ` Clemens Ladisch
2010-03-08 0:04 ` Magnus Lynch
2010-03-16 16:01 ` Clemens Ladisch
2010-03-18 19:11 ` Andrew Morton
2010-03-19 4:06 ` Magnus Lynch
2010-03-22 22:21 ` Andrew Morton
2010-03-23 2:02 ` Magnus Lynch
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4B8B901E.4050302@ladisch.de \
--to=clemens@ladisch.de \
--cc=bob.picco@hp.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=maglyx@gmail.com \
--cc=venkatesh.pallipadi@intel.com \
--cc=vojtech@suse.cz \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.